User talk:Nintendorulez
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Quick note for admins: If you're going to ban me, let me know what I'm doing wrong first, and I can simply stop. It's hard to avoid getting banned when the "rules" don't clearly define what is and isn't allowed. --User:Nintendorulez 22:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
“I'm going to fucking bury that guy. I've done it before and I'll do it again. I'm going to fucking kill Nintentdorulez”
~ Flammable on Nintendorulez
Anarchy Theory
I just want to share the good word of anarchy on uncyclopedia to you. Anarchism makes uncyclopedia a paradise. It gets rid of temptations of spammers because there is no consequences for their actions because their will be no mods or admins. If you got any questions or complaints contact me. Thank you. Mylen 16:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- It doesn't get rid of temptation. The knowledge that nobody can stop them from vandalizing makes them do it more. Sure, Uncyc would be a paradise. A paradise for vandals. I've already debunked all your arguments in the forum topic, so stfu and quit bugging me. --User:Nintendorulez 16:49, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Pay Recieved
Thank you muchly, Plot #4 is now yours.--The One and Only Czar Yah 17:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
League of Benson
You're in the League! Benson 22:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Unpocalypse
I was poking around the most linked to pages, when I noticed Unpocalypse was rather high up, even higher then the Main Page. I was shocked. When I first created the page nothing linked to it. So I tried to figure out how come it now had 279 (as of this message) pages linking to it. After poking around, I discovered that you had added it to your signature. A was amazed! When it was first nominated, Unpocalypse was resoundingly voted down due to its many inside jokes (it relies upon them for funny). I was wondering why you added it to your sig. I am highly flattered, and am not suggesting at all that you should remove it :). If this means that you have taken an intrest in the article and would like to see it featured, by all means nominate it whenever you like. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 22:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- I mainly added it since I'm the Anti-Chron. Mayble I'll nominate it later. --User:Nintendorulez 22:25, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Google Issues
I have been on the forefront of the Freedom of Expression/{{C|template}} fight that's underway, currently because people believe that to be the reason Google removed us. I had another theory, but not being a gmail user, I can't test it out; until I noticed that you were one while looking to see if anyone had tried google on their forums. If i could pester you, could you try Running a diagnostic (preferably with Uncyc as the actual thing)? And if that's not a problem, could you look at their Automatic URL Removal to see how easy it is to remove someone else's website? I hate to ask a lot of you, good sir, but I'm wondering if there's more to this than google. Thanks, sir. --epynephrin 21:53, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not a webmaster here, and it says this is supposed to only be done by the webmaster. And there's some sort of verification thing to be done by putting some file in the root of the site. Which I certainly can't do. Try asking chron. --User:Nintendorulez 21:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- well, my theory was that someone else got jealous of our success, and deleted us from the google registry, but that quashes my theory altogether. Oh well, wasn't all that attached to it... --epynephrin 22:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Identity Theft
Check the talk page.-- Sir Severian
(Sprich mit mir!)
00:47, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Quoting
Please see the disucssions here and here before adding any more quotes to Uncyclopedia. -- 20:38, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Cleanup Cleanup Everybody Everywhere
Sorry for the gratuitous Barney reference, but I wanted to let you know that I deleted the "User:Nintendorulez/B" redirect to "BBBBBBBBB!", just for the sake of general cleanup. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!]
22:43, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Sophia Timeline
I remember Sophia's timeline... I deleted it because it wasn't haiku. Sorry. Maybe you could put it in haiku and put it under Here's to Sophia or something. --Clorox
MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 20:08, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
unsigned vote
Please sign your vote for the kanye template on Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/templates --Willy on wheels! 21:21, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
zork
I reverted your changes to zork, since it seems you did it without consensus of carlb or nerd42. If you wish to make changes, please see the discussion in the Dump. --Splaka 04:49, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Enlarged via code
You can enlarge images thusly with wikicode --Splaka 22:13, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC) : [[Image:Seizure.gif|400px|thumb]]
- It seems to only work with thumbnails though, since this won't get bigger:
- Complain complain. You can't resize inline images true. Fine, I uploaded a bigger vers. --Splaka 22:58, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. *kicks wikimedia software* You and your thumbnails! Although perhaps thumbnails might be even more painful to the eye for this template... --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 23:01, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Euroipods
If you recall, you are not allowed to touch Euroipods for any reason, whatsoever. I have reverted your edits and we're considering how to punish you for failing to follow the rules.
03:03, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- There's an established policy which has been put into effect. Cheers. --KATIE!! 03:09, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Right purge your browser cache and check euroipods--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 22:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
IRC
The admins wish to discuss matters of great importance with you. Please come on to IRC, as the topic is about your special rules and it is of the upmost importance that you come now. --KATIE!!19:56, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Blasphemy! Oh well... all in good fun? --KATIE!! 21:23, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Award!
I award you this userbox for an indubitably enormous level of asshattery.
| | This user has attained a plane of asshattery previously thought unreachable and needs to be cockpunched immediately. |
- Nonymous 20:09, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- YAY! My first award! ^_^ --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 12:45, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- Congratulations! Your efforts deserve recognition. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me)
- Congratulations! Your efforts deserve recognition. -- Sir Mhaille
Thanks
| | THIS USER VOTES WISELY They voted for me. And I didn't even have to bribe them. |
- I tell ya, it was hilarious. I'm gonna set it as my mom's background and watch her keep clicking "OK", panic because they don't go away... etc... --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 12:36, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Expletive
Encyclop*dia Dramatica isn't censorship, the asterisk allegedly stands for a copyrighted letter that cannot be used on this site because of the fear of DMCA warnings. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 16:50, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Hence making it all the more offensive if we leave the copyrighted letter there. It's an expletive, is it not?
Cthulhu
Since we were able to trace the excellent question back to you, Cthluhu has asked that you be given this as a token of his gratitude.
--<<
>> 23:55, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
And, while I'm at it...
| | THIS USER VOTES WISELY They voted for me. And I didn't even have to bribe them. |
I appreciate your vote AND help with Do NOT click any links!. I think it's really awesome how good of a sport you've been about the Euroipods torture you've recieved. And for not holding my jokes about it against me. :) Anywho, cheers.--<<
>> 19:35, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- By the way, Nin. I don't know if you've noticed, but many users have cited the "clicking tangent" as their favorite part of this article. Good show! If I get featured article status, you're getting a ninjastar for that.--<<
>> 17:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
As promised.--<<
>> 02:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- ^_^ No problem. It just seemed fitting to turn the pages links into further things, since obvoiusly you aren't supposed to click links, and I wound up going overboard, ard now we have that nice, long piece of madness. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 18:48, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
question
are you admin? maybe you can answer me what is the license of
88.153.142.102 20:34, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- No, I'm not an admin. And what kind of license would you be referring to? Copyright? Driver's? All I see is some image, and I have no clue who it is, where it comes from, etc. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 23:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
I reckon', it's Billie-Joe Armstrong. --Joewithajay 15:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Ban Patrol usage
You do not need to be an admin to use Ban Patrol and, in fact, Ban Patrol exists for the purpose of allowing astute non-admins to alert admins to problems. --Sir gwax (talk)
22:05, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I thought so. I just listed that in the summary just in case my assumption was wrong. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 22:09, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Do NOT click any links!/click33
You've ruined the sacred path to the secret of Uncyclopedia. For shame! - Nonymous 21:02, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
- Huh? How so? --User:Nintendorulez 21:05, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, that was the redirect to Misleading. Yeah, we already had a page like that earlier on, I think it was #17. --User:Nintendorulez 21:07, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
- You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you? Edit away on the main namespace page, but heed the comment and don't revert the discussion page. - Nonymous 21:10, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
- Well what was what appeared to be part of the main series doing on a discussion page? Whenever there's not a link, it's already established that you simply edit the URL. --User:Nintendorulez 21:23, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not going to spell it out to you, but something about that page is different. It is a clue to a mystery, and not part of the main series. - Nonymous 21:26, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
- Not part of the main series? In that case, it ought to go elsewhere! --User:Nintendorulez 10:30, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not going to spell it out to you, but something about that page is different. It is a clue to a mystery, and not part of the main series. - Nonymous 21:26, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
- Well what was what appeared to be part of the main series doing on a discussion page? Whenever there's not a link, it's already established that you simply edit the URL. --User:Nintendorulez 21:23, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
- You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you? Edit away on the main namespace page, but heed the comment and don't revert the discussion page. - Nonymous 21:10, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, that was the redirect to Misleading. Yeah, we already had a page like that earlier on, I think it was #17. --User:Nintendorulez 21:07, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
NRV vs. QVFD
Hi Nin. Whilst I appreciate your help in tagging short, worthless articles, please try to better judge which of the above options is more appropriate. I've just deleted a bunch of stuff, including a one-word article that you NRV tagged:
- (Deletion log); 18:22 . . Codeine (Talk | contribs | block) (deleted "Megalon": content was: 'A giant cockroach{{NRV|13:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)}}')
- (Deletion log); 18:22 . . Codeine (Talk | contribs | block) (deleted "Cotana": content was: 'cutey{{NRV|14:13, 24 April 2006 (UTC)}}')
...for example. These two (and others like them) should go straight to QVFD - there's very little to suggest that the creator is intending to expand them, and they don't need to hang around cluttering up the Special:Shortpages for a whole week. NRV is generally for articles that could stand an outside chance of being saved. The guidelines for both are at Uncyclopedia:No Redeeming Value and Uncyclopedia:QuickVFD if you're uncertain, and there's also a VD discussion about it here. Cheers! -- Sir Codeine KUN VFP Bur. MDA NS UotM CM +S (Harangue) 17:40, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Ah. Yeah. I suppose I should use that more often... *coughI'malazyassholeandIfindtheonelittletemplatemucheasierandfastercough* --User:Nintendorulez 18:39, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Random crap ^_^
- Jumps in the air** HOLY SHIT!-westsider17
- *uses nowiki tag to print asterisks on a newline* Heheh. Hax. --User:Nintendorulez 18:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
NYD's
The New York Dolls were cross dressers. I'm 'accusing' them of being a baseball team. Pepé Le Pew 18:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- Still unfunny NRV material. --User:Nintendorulez 19:09, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Cheers...
...for voting for my image Noob friendly almanack at VFP! It is much appreciated, although I think it's probably gonna be shot down. Have a pie my friend.
Enjoy. --Hindleyite
Talk 12:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Thank you!
Heh, I must admit that you crossed my mind when I was trying to invent controversial comments and people for my book cover. :) I had a feeling you might enjoy seeing RC's Featured!™ catchphrase on there, though I wasn't sure if you'd actually read the article. I'm glad you found it in time. :) Thanks for the vote. ~ T. (talk) 04:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- The joke never gets old. Never. Ever. ^_^ --User:Nintendorulez 11:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- It will be passed on from father to son for all time.... -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me)
- It certainly will. --User:Nintendorulez 11:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- It will be passed on from father to son for all time.... -- Sir Mhaille
FUWAA Club
| | This user is a member of the FUWAA Club. The Club that nobody cares about. |
I've made a template, you can add it to your userpage if you like, please do, the category is looking rather sparse -- 17:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
You needed new forums.
So what do you think of these? Reply on that page and that page only. ~ 16:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Game
Oh, sorry. I didn't know about the fake ending. I got a bit confused there. I thought that there really was an ending. Those pages are a bit different from the others I can tell you. Thanks anyway. --User talk:Nintendorulez.css 19:17, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Classified Document
I stumbled across the Carlow Crab page today, and noticed that on the talk page you wanted to see the original article that started the madness, and I did as well. So, I did some investigating, googled it, and....I FOUND IT. The idiot made his crappy article at ED as well, and I found the original version before they deleted it too. GO HERE [ED] to see the original Carlow Crap article. Its pretty scary though, so tread carefully. Sir C
Holla | CUN --02:21, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
We need motherfucking Snakes on this motherfucking Uncyclopedia.
You're absolutely right, and I have some ideas for a Snakes on a Plane article. For example, we portray Snakes on a Plane as some post 9/11 conspiracy and add your BENSON pic of Samuel L. Jackson. I think we could collab on this. Tell me if you're interested. Crazyswordsman 22:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oooh, I like the conspiracy idea. Although note that the BENSON pic wasn't made by me. --User:Nintendorulez 01:50, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
An honest Proposition
Greetings, sir or madam! I am here to enlighten you about the Golden Users, a group dedicated to bring bad articles from the abyss occupied by ED and Euroipods and into the light of good, if not Quasi-featured, articles.--Emmzee 02:59, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
that wolf quote
Yes, um... Sorry about that. A madman was running around QDb with admin powarz and a shotgun... he's been "DEALT WITH." You needn't worry, it should be there for good, now.--<<
>> 23:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
QUIT BRINGING BACK SHIT FROM THE ARCHIVE!!!
I've about had it with you, dickhead. Quit bringing back stuff from the archive on Vandalism/example on wheels!. --RedPooka 20:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- You don't own the page. Also, I modified it from the original version in the archive. It's not "bringing back shit" if I changed it, now is it? Plus when polls are moved to the archive, votes get reset. Thus they need to be on the main article. Quit your whining if one tiny bit returns from the old version. --User:Nintendorulez 20:38, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
The Emperor has no clothes
Your rants are classic. I'm writing an UnBook here. You're free to help me out if you'd like, I mean, since it's dedicated to you after all. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 07:01, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Haha, that's brilliant. If I come up with anything I'll be sure to help edit. --User:Nintendorulez 12:19, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Some message that was left on you're user page
- Hey what do you think of this OMG TIHS GUY I KNO IZ GAY LOLOLO it may need a bit more gramatical errors and more msn talk stuff, but I think it's a fair start. I like Radiohead 15:41, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
We should comemorate this in some way
I'm thinking a template for our Aspie users (of which we have so many), saying something to the effect of "don't make a false move, or this aspie will go on a killing spree," or something or some similar mockage of annony's "respectful" view of Aspies. What do you think?--<<
>> 02:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Heh, brilliant. Make sure you put in at least one reference to Jack Thompson as well. --User:Nintendorulez 20:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, I've decided to go with a reskin instead.--<<
>> 20:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Heh. Pretty funny. --User:Nintendorulez 20:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I have another version that would go hand in hand with Brad's. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 20:13, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Heh. Pretty funny. --User:Nintendorulez 20:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, I've decided to go with a reskin instead.--<<
BTW, nin, now that my head is cleared, I've noticed you already had a pretty darn hilarious AS-themed userbox on your page. Cool beans.--<<
>> 21:00, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism
Long ago, as a compromise to the edit warring on Vandalism, Vandalism/example on wheels! was created. Why is it that you are now going back and screwing with Vandalism again? 28/10 19:38
- I simply made an edit I thought was funny, that's all. I saw that in the history log and thought perhaps it would be acceptable in choose tags. See, the idea is that we could make all the vandalism on it within choose tags so it may or may not appear. Then, as you refresh the page, it'll look like a legitimate article that is being vandalized and reverted in real time, though it's only choose tags creating the illusion. You don't like the idea? --User:Nintendorulez 19:44, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- As can be seen in Vandalism/example on wheels!, once vandalism starts happening, the whole page goes to shit, and becomes an unfunny mess. Because once someone sees a little vandalism, they add to it. If we could keep vandalism to a small, well-planned amount, that would be great. The problem we ran into before was that we couldn't, thus spawning a sub-page which could sit around as an unfunny mess, whilst retaining at least some readable content. Feel free to make subpages of vandalism, and tastefully add them as links from the main article. However, I'm going to have to pull bastard admin and insist that the main article stay "obvious-vandalism" free. 28/10 21:37
- Sounds reasonable to me. But what about the idea of embedding each and every piece of vandalism in choose tags? You may or may not see a normal picture of Sopia, you already may or may not see PENIS, etc. --User:Nintendorulez 22:25, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Again, sounds like a great idea. Except for all the idiots who go to the page, don't realise that they are in choose tags, and then just add their own crap. Or decide, like a recent editor, that they don't see the vandalism often enough, so they remove the weighting or choose tags. My concern is that I don't want the main article to end up looking like the example subpage, which is where it tends to go when people see clear vandalism on the main article. 28/10 22:32
- Meh, it's a wiki, what do you expect? And if they add their own crap, we can just lower weights accordingly so you don't see too much stuff at once. And there's always the revert, <!-- Notes placed in these thingys -->, etc. Methinks I'll start drafting that as a subpage tomorrow. I'll just left this red link sit here for no reason so I can click it later: User:Nintendorulez/vanddraft --User:Nintendorulez 22:40, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Again, sounds like a great idea. Except for all the idiots who go to the page, don't realise that they are in choose tags, and then just add their own crap. Or decide, like a recent editor, that they don't see the vandalism often enough, so they remove the weighting or choose tags. My concern is that I don't want the main article to end up looking like the example subpage, which is where it tends to go when people see clear vandalism on the main article. 28/10 22:32
- Sounds reasonable to me. But what about the idea of embedding each and every piece of vandalism in choose tags? You may or may not see a normal picture of Sopia, you already may or may not see PENIS, etc. --User:Nintendorulez 22:25, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- As can be seen in Vandalism/example on wheels!, once vandalism starts happening, the whole page goes to shit, and becomes an unfunny mess. Because once someone sees a little vandalism, they add to it. If we could keep vandalism to a small, well-planned amount, that would be great. The problem we ran into before was that we couldn't, thus spawning a sub-page which could sit around as an unfunny mess, whilst retaining at least some readable content. Feel free to make subpages of vandalism, and tastefully add them as links from the main article. However, I'm going to have to pull bastard admin and insist that the main article stay "obvious-vandalism" free. 28/10 21:37
Hey Nin
Just wanted to say, loved your 9/11 picture and caption in Forum:Asperger Syndrome is no laughing matter.
I know it's unlikely, but I hope that Codeine and others who disagree with how I handled the situation appreciated that if I kept my mouth shut, people would have thought I was a wimp, and for better or for worse, I decided that wasn't the image I wanted people to have of me. It really was a no-win situation and I made the choice that was right for me. I say, if you mess with the bull, you get the horns. When people attack me, I fight back. That's just how I am.
And it's a little odd that I got criticized for what I wrote and nobody went after Mhallie after saying the guy should have his brains blown out:
- In that case the problem must be related to lead deficiency....about two inches worth injected at high velocity into the frontal lobes should resolve the issue once and for all. -- Your caring, sharing Admins
I don't know what this means in terms of why this all happened the way it did, particularly the mini backlash I got for letting Uncyclopedia know exactly what I thought of Slashy and his "contribution" to the site. But I do find it a bit curious. --Hrodulf 20:48, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, that Mhaille guy is a right bastard..... -- Mister Nice
- I thought it was a pretty funny line. And I'd say we were polite to Slashy in the beginning, but he no longer deserves any respect. Slashy was never civil to us, why should we be civil to him? Stooping to other peoples' level is fun. ^_^ --User:Nintendorulez 21:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
I have no problem with Mhaille's post, btw, it was funny! But I just think people got mad at me over a pretty frivolous issue, and it was a little bit weird. --Hrodulf 21:30, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- People overreact to things all the time. Reminds me of my life's motto: Life sucks, get the fuck used to it. ^_^ --User:Nintendorulez 21:34, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Yep. --Hrodulf 02:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Not Muhammad
Thanks for the pleasant surprise. Part of my mission here is to get more satire on Uncyc. I got lucky once on VFH (with one there now that looks like it'll end up quasi), but up to this point I've failed on VFP (and not for lack of trying. Indeed, for awhile I was a self-nom whore there...). In a way it's come full circle, as that pic was the first overtly political pic, for the first satirical page that I made for Uncyc. Again, thanks. ...and consume this cookie!
| Modusoperandi has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic. |
--Sir Modusoperandi 06:06, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Reverting
My revert wasn't impromptu; I saw your "contribution" and decided that repeating the phrase "Get over it" 30 times fell under the "spam/harrasment" category. Also, be honest in your edit summaries; "someone" didn't register the username "Rewrite", you sockpuppeted it. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·S · (Harangue) 16:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism Box
Hey, so we disagree on Vandalism Box, eh? Well I think it's better with the repeat and minimal vandalism, but I won't fight you on it, you seem to be the resident expert on vandalism :) Though I think if you're going to have a different thing in each box, the version before I changed it would be better than the template mess there is now! What do you think? There's not much point in the templates if you can have it all right there on the page, and it also makes template loading time a non-issue. Does mean we'd have both wasted quite a bit of time doing our own things only to have it put back before we changed it, but that's uncyc for you! I think I'll move my version to User:Spang/Spang's vandalism box or something. I'll put it back to before we changed it for now, but if you really, really think all those templates are worth it (which they aren't :P), you can put it all back. 22:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. ^_^ Damn we have so many versions of Vandalism... And I have one I've been meaning to make for a few days... --User:Nintendorulez 20:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Wait, I got an idea: To keep it all nice and editable, I simply substed everything from that old version. Looks nice, doesn't it? --User:Nintendorulez 21:09, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Zork userbox
I added a modified version of your Zork 1 userbox to the bottom of Game:Zork/ancientmap. --L 06:23, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Userpage
I'm not sure what was going on between you and Elvis, but I've unprotected and reverted your page. Whatever he thinks you did, I figured you've paid for it by now. Besides, your page is your own. Mainspace pages are a different matter, as you well know. Tread lightly. :) ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 03:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey Nin, I see you found my erm, present, I was starting to think that you may never notice! What was it that alerted you BTW, (I see Todd reverted it for you already so there is no need for me to), toddle pip --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 22:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- I dunno. I just noticed it all of a sudden. >_> --User:Nintendorulez 00:27, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
| Elvis has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic. |
IRC
For a moment.
Premier Tom Mayfair
23:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nevermind.
Premier Tom Mayfair
23:12, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
You? Quit?
Oooh, that's right, you're not an addict. You can quit, any time you want to. Funny, but I thought "quitting" meant not doing it anymore. Or are you quitting tomorrow? Have you considered a Twelve-step_program? :) 12/4 01:20
BTW, nice work keeping your head down these last few days. I know it must have been damn hard, but you did a fairly good job staying low-profile. That was smart. Erase one bad thing I've said about you in the past.
- Yeah, tomorrow. Or maybe the next day. Or the next. ^_^ Actually, I just felt I'd leave some relevant comments in the topics pertaining to the current situation. Other than that, I'm pretty much gone for now. --User:Nintendorulez 01:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the vote!
| | THIS USER VOTES WISELY They voted for me. And I didn't even have to bribe them. |
Without your vote, surely someone worthy of the award would have actually won. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Xmas
| | Premier Tom Mayfair does not share in your pagan ways. Nor does he celebrate capitalist retail. He hopes that you convert to Communism before it's too late. Do the right thing. Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь! | |
Premier Tom Mayfair
22:46, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
I was thinking...
Maybe, if you can't get the reskin, you could celebrate Benson's return by changing your nick to say BENSONRULEZ (if only for a day, or a week, or so). I'm just thinking of ways you can celebrate Benson-day (or the day of Benson's return).--<<
>> 01:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- I just realized I didn't specify "your nick in your signature", and should have.--<<
>> 01:40, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm changing pretty much everything in my sig/userpage/etc to commemorate B-Day. I even customized my CSS to replace the logo with Bensonsopedia on every page! --User:Nintendorulez 20:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
| Hindleyite was throwing away last year's Christmas cards, and realised they had This user doesn't care about Multi-culturalism, and DEMANDS you have a Merry Christmas... NOW! |
And a Happy New Year. -- Hindleyite Converse 16:54, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
| Bradaphraser was throwing away last year's Christmas cards, and realised they had This user is completely thoughtless, doesn't care about Multi-culturalism, and therefore DEMANDS you have yourself a Merry little Christmas... NOW! Failure to comply with result in disciplinary action up to and including excommunication from the Capitalist Church |
May you focus on your successes and forget your failures here at the end of the year. Never forget how we all improve one another's lives. Season's Greetings.--<<
>> 17:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
| | Nothing says [[Insert religious or pagan holiday of your choice]] like getting drunk with a moose. So this year, why not savour a treasured Canadian tradition with a bottle of hooch, horns, hooves, and hypothermia? The drinks are on me. ~ Todd | |
--Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 15:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
| Merry Chrizzle, Happy Hanukizzle, and a Kick Ass Kwizzle from Me & Snoop Dizzle! |




