User talk:The Thinker

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Talk Archive 1 | Talk Archive 4 | Talk Archive 7
Talk Archive 2 | Talk Archive 5
Talk Archive 3 | Talk Archive 6

DO NOT WHORE ON MY TALK PAGE.
I'm a very regular user. If I want to vote for your article, trust me, I'll find it.

New on Bottom, Por Favor

Contents 1 Worship may resume? WORSHIP? 1.1 Hey guys 2 Question Mark? 3 Is... 4 RAAAWR 5 Pic? 6 Just a quick note 7 UnNews:Irish voters got it all wrong 8 Adoption For n00bs 9 Join The CMC! Make Your Inner Cow Happy! 10 Thanks for Voting! 11 Collab 12 Hey It's Me Again 13 Okay, sir, you've convinced me. 13.1 Subtopic 14 Hello! My Name is THINKER... 15 Woaaaah, far out! 16 Hmm... 17 TheGreatLiquidFox: A Mid-page Declaration 18 Remember me? 19 While I was out... 20 The thinker!!! 21 Judgery

[edit] Worship may resume? WORSHIP?

I don't worship ANYONE except God, Mickey Mouse and the feet of my favorite prostitute! --THE 23:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Same goes for me, except with Zappa, Freakazoid and the feet of my favorite kinky pornos. -RAHB 23:22, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, Jim Henson, MST3K and the ass of women who sleep with me by choice are my lords and saviors, but hey man, THINKERism is being put on the Florida state religious roster for 2012. My followers may worship freely! --THINKER 23:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

THEism is revolutionising the state of Maine as well. All of Maine's literate residents adore me. --THE 23:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

There are already too many religions in California. I don't even bother. -RAHB 23:27, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hey guys

THINKER's back. - Don Leddy the Crunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 01:29, May 29

Oh shit, really? Oh yeah, HI THINKER! -RAHB 04:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

And now ladies and gentlemen, Mr. Tom Jones!

--THINKER 04:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Question Mark?

What's that question mark there for? Is there anything I can do to the article to remove said mark? I'm not actually trying to change your vote here, or whore in any way, just to get the feedback of someone whose opinion I value. Don't just leave me with an enigmatic vote comment here man! ;-) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 08:45, May 29

Its just kinda Sarah Plain and Tall man. It doesn't compel me, and I didn't get all the many laughs out of it. Thus, a question mark. Sorry my friend. --THINKER 13:37, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I was kinda wondering if you had any suggestions to make it less plain, but never mind. You've joined an exclusive club good sir, you are only my second ever against vote thus far. I was expecting far more, given some of the articles I've put out! Still, your honesty is always appreciated, and it's good to see you about the place. Hang on, didn't I say that in a previous post on this page? Am I starting to repeat myself already? Heck... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 13:50, May 29

I feel kinda responsible for this... well I felt it was ready :/ --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Woah, slow down there DJ - it's got a few votes, and I'm not complaining about Thinker's vote or your nom or anything. I was just asking his opinion on how he would have improved it - if you can't get advice from the WotY, who can you get advice from? If it's a quasi, it's a quasi, and so be it, I'm happy with that. I refuse to whore it about or get miffed that it didn't hit everyone's funny button. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 14:02, May 29

Look man, I'm admittedly tough on VFH noms. If there aren't going to be quality reforms elsewhere on the site, I like to express tough love on what makes the front page.

That said, I have never been a huge fan of dispensing comedic/prose advice in a few sentences, and I especially don't like to do it after the article is already completed. Even pieces that I think have huge potential (ie. pieces I end up THINKERing) I don't mess with until it's stood on it's own merit. If the rest of the gang thinks its ready for FA (which it very well might be -- different strokes, etc) then don't worry about it. If it fails and you'd like to get in-depth with it, we'll talk at length. Don't be offended though man; it's just a nom, and doesn't mean I don't like your writing. --THINKER 14:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

I wasn't complaining about the vote in the slightest! As I said, thanks for your honesty (I am repeating myself - am I going prematurely senile?) The day I get that bothered about a vote or a feature is the day I stop editing Uncyc. Correspondence on this topic closed - see you around! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 14:32, May 29

Right. All I'm saying is that if you want the advice from me, it should be before the article starts and isn't gunna be in 3 words. Laterz --THINKER 16:07, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to but in chaps! I happened to be wandering past and wondered if perhaps I might pick some brains so to speak. I have been toying with the idea of voting against on VFH a bit more than I do myself recently. I think far too many people just read and vote for if it's even vaguely good. If they hate it, they don't vote. Practical upshot is that we have to rely on time stripping out a non popular nom, and a lot of people's reading time goes for nothing when it could be helping make VFH better. Is that your thinking Thinker? Also, are you saying that you don't think VFH is a place to improve articles? Maybe I read you wrong. As I said, sorry to but in, this may be my first appearance on this page, but I'm thinking of changing how I vote to a more Thinker like style and wondered what your thoughts were. Cheers. Sorry about all the poopy puns, I'm in a punny stupid mood. MrN  00:49, Jun 2

To clarify... I guess I'm asking... "Do you think the silent abstain is a bad thing"? MrN  01:03, Jun 2

It depends, if it is something that took little to no effort and is just crap then fine but sometimes you may not get it and others will and find it hilarious. If it is well written I vote For even if I don't fully understand it as a recognition of their effort. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 01:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Why vote based on what you think might be the opinion of others? If you don't get it surely you should vote against? If everyone did that would VFH not work better? MrN  01:24, Jun 2

mmm but if the person put in a lot of effort it is hardly fair to go FAIL I dUn git it?... --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 01:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I think VFH would work better if everyone did. Thanks for your comments DJ, I guess we should leave poor thinkers talk page alone now until such time as he decides to comment. Cheers. MrN  01:35, Jun 2

I think VFH would work better if the featured article every day cycled between things I have written. Think about it. -RAHB 02:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

I have no opinion about the voting habits of others, or want to be made as someone who is trying to "set an example" for other users when it comes to voting (that would be pie making; there I may be exalted on high). People are free to vote however they choose, and I respect that concept. However, I am a strongly opinionated person when it comes to comedy (see my archives with me and the moose fellow debating), and I'm honest about it.

I do take a little more stock in the quality of features than others. As egotistical as this may sound, I like to surround my work with other pieces of outstanding writing and humor. And as the mainpage is the first thing a person sees when first coming to Uncyc, I think they should be greeted with something funny that represents the best the site has to offer. I think the site is too polite with criticism: keep in mind my votes are never aimed at any of the writers personally. My personality clashes with certain users but I still view their work for the work itself. That Thursday Ape person told me to fuck off and I still vote for his funny ones. I'm just being honest for the benefit of the writers; I'm not consciously lying to them, or withholding a vote until their run whithers away. VFH: you ask our opinions, and you will get mine from me.

As for my feeling about improving articles mid-VFH, that too is just my personal feeling. I don't like to work on articles mid-run because personally I don't like that situation as a working condition. Just me; if you can make an article better, improve it all the live-long day.

In short: It's yo thang, do whatcha wanna do. I'ma do me. Other song lyric that means vote however makes you happy on VFH. --THINKER 05:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. MrN  16:59, Jun 2

Any time. We do have fun here on THINKER's Corner, don't we folks? --THINKER 17:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

And now, this:

*pop* Yeah, er, thanks for *pop* your vote for *pop* that... oh lord, her whole dress is made of... *popop* *pop*

OK, it wasn't a for vote, but I thank everyone who's taken time to read and article and give an opinion in the form of a vote. And as I believe I said earlier, your honesty is always welcome! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 13:24, Jun 4

Any time man. Can't wait for the next one. --THINKER 04:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Is...

...this you? Sir Modusoperandi 22:12, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

And while we're at it...is this? --THE 00:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Naw. Thinker is this. Sir Modusoperandi 00:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Silly people. this is Thinkerer. -RAHB 01:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

1. No.
2. Yes (in 1987; we had the best camera on the block back then)
3. Yes (you caught me in one of my "black and pissy" moods)
4. WTF? Not cool.
--THINKER 05:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Ah-ha! So you aren't Thinkerer! Sir Modusoperandi 05:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

lol --THINKER 05:39, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Lol, indeed. Serendipity as well. Sir Modusoperandi 05:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RAAAWR

RAAAAWR!! GRAAH! Gavin thanks you for voting to publish his memoirs. Just don't let any trannies read it. Thanks for voting.

~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 12:52 Jun 5

[edit] Pic?

About this. So yeah, I've got RAHB, how about the mighty THINKER? Or will the software not adequately capture your likeness? ;-) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 14:23, Jun 9

I made one last night, I'll add it this evening. --THINKER 16:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

My gallery has been THINKER'd. Cool! Nice hat. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 09:46, Jun 12

[edit] Just a quick note

Hi, I just saw your against vote-thats cool. However I would be grateful if you did not "Overhall" my article-The humour is intentionaly a lot more subtle than any of my prevous efforts, and I think this has worked well, plus there aren't any more areas of his career I see that would be worth my while to Parody-the key areas of his career are in the bag there.Thanks--— Sir Sycamore (talk to me) 07:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely. --THINKER 16:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] UnNews:Irish voters got it all wrong

Hiho, thanks for t(h)inkering around with the UnNews article, but I have one question: you do know that our beloved chancelorette Angela Merkel is a woman, don't you? So I presume the use of his (in "his last audience with George W. Bush") is intended for satirical purposes. Or not? Cheers. NaturalBornKieler (talk) 13:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I must've thought I was talking about Sarkozy in that instance, good catch. I hope everything in the update is to your liking. --THINKER 04:48, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Very much so, never fear. I always try to maintain a high standard in my articles' language, but as a non-native speaker I might miss the best way to express things just by so much. And of course there are many funny aspects I'd never could begin to think of from my German point of view. - The special funny thing in your "his"/"her" edit, on the other hand, is that Angela Merkel in German Uncyclopedia and other satires is often referred to as "it" (in German "Das Merkel", which cannot be translated since you have no different gender pronouns :), but I think this sort of joke would be rather lost in the English language. NaturalBornKieler (talk) 08:41, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Hah, yeah I get ya. You've got a great command of English for a non-native speaker though man, don't belittle your abilities. I'm sure like you said about the "her/him" vs. "it" thing; comedy doesn't always translate well from one language to another (Spanish especially; I've noticed this many a late night watching Univision). If you're this good with satire in English, your German work must be quite hysterical. --THINKER 08:50, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

I hope so :) Thanks. Cannot say much about Spanish, though - my Spanish is barely sufficient to buy a cup of coffee. Cheers. NaturalBornKieler (talk) 14:04, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Hey, the article made it! Thanks for the nomination! NaturalBornKieler (talk) 12:04, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

For your vote in favour of today's FA, please allow me to serve you a modest Irish breakfast:

Cheers. NaturalBornKieler (talk) 21:39, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Adoption For n00bs

TheGreatLiquidFox He seeks your great adopting powers. Target missles at Mayo, they must die! --TheGreatLiquidFox

Okay, lesson 1: we talk on talk pages. I'll respond on your talk. --THINKER 00:19, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

...by the way, that's an invitation, not a whore. - Sir FSt. Yettie (talk) (>>)

QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

[21:50 29 June]

I don't join these kinds of things, sorry. --THINKER 22:47, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for Voting!

-- Hanyouman 15:18, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Collab

So, hey, I'd like to write another UnTune. Er, do you have any ideas? Or lyrics? --Hyperbole 17:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

YES! Yes I do have lyrics. Can you play funk guitar riffs? --THINKER 06:19, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh. Wow. Um... maybe. It's amazing the things I can do that I can't do, given technology and enough takes :) --Hyperbole 17:30, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Hah, hey man as long as it sounds good in the end I don't care how you make it happen. Gimmie a little bit of time (I'm working a bit more the next 2 weeks so I'm gunna just write it there). We'll figure out how the music will go once the I get the lyrics down and get a basic framework with my little '96 pimpin' casio keyboard (really just core melodic concepts; I'll leave most of the musical end to you). Which reminds me, what kind of programs and equipment are you working with? I'm an audio engineer, so I could probably secure some studio time for Pro Tools editing depending how well the rough draft comes out. Also if I can't, RAHB has some decent software, so I can work with him to perfect it. I'll keep ya posted, 'cause the song idea I'm thinking of going with is pretty funny. --THINKER 22:29, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hey It's Me Again

Yeah, me. I wrote something. I actually like this something. I would be enthralled if you read it. I enjoy simple sentences. http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/UnNews:4th_of_July_celebrates_birth_of_Chris_Hansen --SirIsaac 00:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

As I sit here and watch the Twilight Zone marathon quite merrily I say that I very much like it! The pic could be a bit better but the caption makes up for that I think. Yeah man, add it to Template:RecentUnNews. I wish you'd write more Mr. Isaac; as my first adoptee turned FA'd writer, I have a special place in my gin-soaked, near-black heart. --THINKER 06:19, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Okay, sir, you've convinced me.

It's July again and I realize the Uncyclopedia I joined last year is not the Uncyclopedia I'm on today. And do you know why? It's about quality. You're absolutely right.

But you know why I'm seeing quality go down the drain? It's because there's no one to impress anymore. I'm not sure if this is the same for everyone, but... Last year, when I was a noob, I was like, "daymn, this site is good, I'd better write some good shit if I want to live." And I did, the first article I wrote was a feature. You are right, it's the standards that pushed me.

I look around today and there's no one to impress. The features feel formulaic. I don't write here for fun because there's no one to write for. Last year, there was you, Ljlego, Thekillerfroggy, RAHB, and the like, and many other great users. Now, they've stopped (or at least very much slowed down) writing, and so have I. Why? Because I know if I really set my mind to it I could probably have a "feature" written by tomorrow.

Last year, it wasn't about the features. Last year, I got real live feedback from other users, like the ones I listed. Last year, it was about having fun, because I felt like I always had to do better. The site felt more alive. Now, it feels like a machine.

That's what I want to avoid, and that's why I'm usually so much against Quality Control, is the machinelike feel. But I think the lack of challenge is what's caused it to be machinelike. I think that in all this, we've lost our "natural" Quality Control - our desire to impress other users as good as or better than ourselves. Where are the regulars, man? I'd be back in a second if all of them were back and writing as much as before. How I do miss last year. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 21:14 Jul 05, 2008

Dr. Skullthumper needs to get laid... You are complaining because you have become a better writer? Oh, hi Thinker. MrN  21:26, Jul 5

I keep forgetting there's no such thing as a personal note on a wiki. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 21:28 Jul 05, 2008

Maybe you should write a bog instead? OK, I'm off this page. Promise. MrN  21:31, Jul 5

TL;DR!!!   CAKE J! <21:43, 05 Jul 2008>

What do you mean we've become formulaic? I resemble that accusation. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

I don't actually have any input for this discussion. I just wanna see how many people can comment in one section of Thinker's talk page before he gets to it. -RAHB 21:56, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I blame Cajek. Ban his ass! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 21:58 Jul 05, 2008

It's always Cajek that adds the irrelevant messages to serious discussions. FU Cajek! For fucking up this discussion! Whatever it was about. -RAHB 22:01, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I believe it had to do with certain people not writing like they used to. Go write something, damn it! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 22:02 Jul 05, 2008

Read it and weep. Actually, you might really weep. I'm not sure if it's funny, I'm still waiting for the reviews to flood in. TKF! WHERE ARE YOU! GET OVER HERE AND WRITE SOMETHING! -RAHB 22:05, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

This is a bump. I'm seriously very curious now to see if we can get like a record number of people to edit a talk page before the owner actually gets to it. -RAHB 22:37, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Somebody owns this place? Looks vacant to me.... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

(diff) (hist) . .  User talk:The Thinker‎; 22:37 . . (+201) . . RAHB (Talk | contribs) 
(→Okay, sir, you've convinced me.:  EVERYBODY EDIT THINKER'S TALKPAGE)

I can't I said I would not. MrN  22:45, Jul 5

Doesn't seem to be working as well as I'd hoped. -RAHB 22:52, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

TL;DR!!!!!!!!   CAKE J! <23:54, 05 Jul 2008>

Shut your fek up Cajek. There he goes again. Just trolling around teh site starting trouble wherever he wanders... MrN  00:00, Jul 6

Dude, balls. That is all. --Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally CUN GotA 01:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Subtopic

Sign here if you think Thinker's sig is ugly. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 00:41 Jul 06, 2008

• EW GRAY. Who the fuck uses gray in their sigs? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 00:41 Jul 06, 2008
• What he said. Zombieninja 00:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
• Something -RAHB 05:48, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hello! My Name is THINKER...

and this is why we can't have nice things. It's not even like I left for any prolonged period of time; I go to work, and return to this. Thanks for the fair warning RAHB. Now I'm going to try to untangle this web of shit. I'm drunk and have to be up in 4 hours, so conditions are perfect.

1. Dr. Skullthumper - I'm glad that you're finally interpreting my statements as they've been intended. But when you're talking about entertaining others man, I think you need to turn it inward. Write to entertain yourself dude. I can't speak for anyone but THINKER, but when I write, the entire process can be summed up in 1 sentence: I find a concept that I think is funny, then use it to make myself laugh. If you write things that entertain you then the goal is already accomplished dude: readership is an awesome, amazing side effect. You're one of the lucky people alive in our failure of a generation that writes well enough to make others laugh. THINKER is telling you this; it's fact. So, first write to entertain yourself my friend. Thereafter, whatever shall be shall be.

In fact if anything, your point about not having the great regs around to appreciate new articles only bolsters the idea of upping the bar around here: if the mainpage is filled with subpar, rubbish articles, what incentive is there for the next Cajek or the next DJ Irreverent to stick around and grace us with their unique brands of humor? Uncyc is one of hundreds of user-generated comedy websites. What makes us so special? Our good writers. Which is why the greats should be on the front page, all our other quality debates, etc. You are one of them man; let's strengthen our good company.

As for the regs not being around, this may be so, and its unfortunate when people trail off. But there is still a pretty active reg readership I think, or at least newer users becoming regs so to speak. I try to read as many new articles as possible, of course most especially VFH articles. And you wanna know what? Let the whole site trail off into oblivion: the writers who properly use Uncyc as a creative outlet shall continue on. Search your feelings; you know it to be true.

2. My sig is probably the most heterosexual on this site, so stuff it.

Hm.. that about covers it. I'm going to continue drinking now, thank you. --THINKER 06:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

"Heterosexual" and yet the words "New on Bottom, Por Favor" appear at the top of your talk page. Questions, questions, question... MrN  22:34, Jul 6

I do write to entertain myself... just not here. It's an internal conflict more than anything else, do I write long stories or try to force myself to write for a site that feels like I'm writing into a black hole? Article writing is not my natural habitat.

Also I find it largely ironic that we're trying to accomplish the same end but think the opposite means will work (more users, better writing, shiz like this). Oh, my aching head. Also, you think this talk page raping was bad? Dude, did you even see my userpage when I left for Lent? Hehe, people r teh funnies.

To clarify, my biggest fear about quality control is locking out the noobs. And yet, quality control seems to encourage the noobs at the same time. Damn it, this is hard. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 01:58 Jul 07, 2008

Well the site being a blackhole I can't help on. If thats the way you feel about it, I'd actually advise you not to access it in favor of seriously honing in on the non-site stuff you do. As an ambitious person in the field, writing your long stories and not being so concerned with the site may be better for you. I am a resilient fucker and do both, but that isn't for everyone most assuredly. If you don't think the site is bettering you in any way then its probably having the opposite affect. That of course isn't to say I'm encouraging to leave -- because I like your work and do look forward to new pieces -- but if you're feeling like Uncyc is a dead end for you, it might be a self-fulfilling prophecy situation.

And locking out n00bs with standards would be if they were ironclad, set-in-stone rules. Front page quality is not that: it is (or should be) merely saying "hey there n00b, you're not ready for the spotlight just yet -- lets get you working towards becoming that level." We have our share of dicks on the site, but staving off n00bs is not a practice of even those folk. --THINKER 02:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Woaaaah, far out!

This is a haiku Thanking you for voting For On this article

-RAHB 23:08, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hmm...

I suppose we should finish the project. It's been what...two years? :-D --THE 16:31, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Dude, I want to. I really want to. But right now, I'm just in a million places, working on actual work and other such ridiculous nonsense. If you want to go ahead and finish the edits, the DVD menu page and all the other stuff we planned, I promise you I will come through and do a THINKERing (much like how we ended up finishing the commentary page). I will also promise to do the UnNews article when the DVD is completely ready to be posted. If you don't want to I completely understand, but you see my contribs man; getting old and wanting more is taking a definite toll on me. I don't like it, but I can't help it at the moment. Hopefully one day in the future I'll be working in the capacity of my dreams and able to be making money and be on Uncyc at the same time. --THINKER 04:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I've not had much time to edit uncyc lately either...I might take you up on the offer for me to finish it then you to THINKER it after. I'll keep you posted! --THE 10:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] TheGreatLiquidFox: A Mid-page Declaration

Hmm, I've now made an UnNews Article, I think I'll go for the Foolitzer Prize when I have atleast five healthy ones. --TheGreatLiquidFox 19:48, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Hah, good on ya mate. I haven't been around to fairly cast a vote, but if I get some time in the coming week I'll look over your progress. --THINKER 04:14, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Remember me?

I'm sorry I seemed to abandon Uncyclopedia, but school got in the way, along with getting banned from the computer for most of the summer. So, um, I'm back! --Anakin 21:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello my young apprentice! I too have been slacking on my Uncyclopedia utilization as of late (though I did put up one article recently). Good to see you're back in the swing of things though; let me know when you post a new article! --THINKER 18:40, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] While I was out...

Uncyclopedia appears to have died and/or turned to shit. I must politely query what the fuck happened, but that is not why I am writing this. Before I realized what happened, I wrote this: UnNews:Medvedev discovered to have strings coming from arms, legs Cheers, mate, assuming you ever read this. --SirIsaac 17:19, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

The direction of the site is somewhat unfortunate, but there is only so much petitioning one can do for quality control measures. I got tired of fighting that fight. But I am very glad to see you continuing to write; I recently read Employee Manual again, and it brought back some very fond memories. This latest piece is yet again another fine example of your talents and strengths -- great stuff dude. --THINKER 04:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The thinker!!!

Hey! I'm kind of not having time to bump around uncyclopedia at the moment. I'm still interested in finishing Sex Seafood though, at some point in the future. "In the future" meaning "at some point before I die." sorry for the pitiful lack of progress on the behind the scenes page. How've you been? --THE 23:34, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Heh, its all good dude, I'm much the same right now. I really would like to see Sex Seafood completed as well, but fear not; the idea is there, and as it is something that I've always thought had insanely grand potential, I might end up rewriting the script and using it for my portfolio (sharing all credit, of course). I think that the actual "film" itself kind of outshines the Bog/UQG story arc, which is what compels me to take it further. But by all means dude, get it to the point that we've always wanted it in whatever time is needed. Uncyc is (hopefully) not going anywhere, except for it's own domain and hosting. ;) --THINKER 04:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I agree that the script itself is actually much more compelling than the UQG and Bog article. The article is amusing but kind of nonsensical, whereas the script is actually a pretty epic satire. Also, I totally missed all of the drama about the domain name. --THE 12:21, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Judgery

Well, the Ball begins this Thursday, and writing will be halted on December 11th. And then the judging begins. I currently have you slated for judging the Aristocrats section of the competition, so here's the notice for that (along with likely another notice the week the judging will begin). Let me know if anything comes up so I can fill the spot. Cheers. (though I know we'll be talking plenty between now and then anyways) -RAHB 08:51, 24 November 2008 (UTC)