User talk:Under user/Archive 5

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Contents 1 Thanks for the nom 2 Review 3 THINKER Loves You 4 Frankly my dear... 5 EPIC FAIL! 6 Because I suck at articles, I have time to work on my tennis arm. 7 You changed your sig? WEIRD. 8 Thanks 9 My goodness no! 10 Matthew Good 11 NINJA! 12 Tanks 13 Re. Bad AE 14 Let's never mention this again, eh? 15 I gots something for youse 16 Thanks 17 Could I possibly get you to review 18 Rough Pubs 19 Travel Guide 20 RE: Image request 21 Follow up on Fat Americans 22 Adware Article 23 Princess Leia RW 24 Yay, encouragement! 25 Peer review 26 In regards toward a pee review and whatnot 27 I'm begging you 28 What's that? A new flavor of ninjastar? 29 Oh, another one! 30 Ahem.. 31 From IViking 32 I think you've merited one of these for a while now. 33 Thanks, wot! 34 Thanks be to you! 35 Yet another thanks 36 Thanks! 37 Late Thanks 38 It's just not adding up! 39 hello 40 About the wolcome template 41 I made those changes 42 Second Changes have been made 43 Thanks for the nom! 44 Thank you for the review! 45 2002 Germany airplane sexual intercourse 46 Belated Thanks! 47 'Welcome'

[edit] Thanks for the nom

And sorry for the rambling, I'm a bit frustrated with Uncync lately. ~ Mordillo 11:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

No worries, it's been a while since I nommed anything, and it's nice to be able to put something I genuinely like up for voting. I just hope it gets the respect it deserves! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

You and me both brotha. ~ Mordillo 12:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

This is not a reply. I'm just road testing my new sig. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 14:26, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Then this is not a reply to your reply Sir Mordillo GUN WotM FP UotM AotM MI AnotM VFH +S

Glad you cleared that up for me. I might have got confused there. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 14:32, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

No worries. And here is a very atrocious wartime old sig of mine Mordillo Hands off the virgin!Time till next rocket hits:

[edit] Review

Hi, would you mind reviewing Fat Americans for me? Thanks! --Æ 18:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I'll have a look at some point, but I've got a busy weekend lined up again (that's the thing with an impending wedding, all your weekends tend to get booked up!) so I can't guarantee when it will be... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 09:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem, take your time. Tommorow, I'm going skiing for the long weekend, so I won't be around either--Æ 18:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Actually you don't need to Pee the article for a while as Gerrycheevers is about to Pee the article. --Æ 22:07, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] THINKER Loves You

Under User...yes, usually when I use 'er, I prefer to be under also. Good choice, in names also.

Anyway, thank you very much for your support in the Writer of the Year competition. With your help, I won, amazingly. Couldn't have done it without ya. So from the bottom of my acid-drenched, corroded heart, I say thanks once more. --THINKER 05:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Definitely very well deserved. Thank you for some of the best laughs of last year! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 09:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Frankly my dear...

Hugs, Dame GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] EPIC FAIL!

	All Praise and Glory Be Yours!
	You have been emphatically thanked for voting for EPIC FAIL! on VFH.
	Due to the nature of the article, your thanks
	template has been stolen from the template
	that tells people a user has been infinibanned.
	EPIC FAIL!

~Fag x FS

[edit] Because I suck at articles, I have time to work on my tennis arm.

In regards to the stock market news thing, your words were helpful. I used the word orifice wrong. Thank you for the humor suggestions, but I regret to inform you that the one specific to the article will not be put into use as (1. Edwards has dropped out and (2. My house burned down. But, I always hated the upholstery. (That was a joke, and a bad one as well) Also, abut the poll comment- Is there a way to make a poll no one can edit? Like a template or something similar? Again. Thank you. Lord Serioch 23:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I suck at articles - that's why I review!

Seriously though: You can always make a template that looks like a poll - a bit of experimenting with formatting should give you something suitable. That would reduce the chances of people editing it. But the only way to make something no-one can edit is to get an admin to protect it. And they only tend to do that to vandal magnets. As to your other comments: seriously, go back to it and put a bit more work in. As I say, the potential is there. The only way to become a better writer is to write more. Honestly. Some of our best writers started out writing absolute crap. So have another look. The fact that you cared enoug to put it up for review, and to come straight over here after the review suggests to me you'd like to do something good, so go for it! My suggestions are there, there's also this list of people happy to help out budding writers. Look down the list until you find one who's active and ask them - there are some very helpful types on there.

Oh, and as to the Edwards thing, simple, swap the words "loser" and "hopeful" around in the sentence, presto! It still works... Just keep going man. Good luck again, and now, good night! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 23:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] You changed your sig? WEIRD.

Thank you sooooo so so much for keeping User:Cajek/Pee updated! I guess I'm on haitus right now. Haitus is my trained warthog. ...see why I need a haitus?   CAKE J! <-> Feb 6 (00:14)

Hi Cajek. Bye Cajek. Nice to see you. Stick around for cakes and coffee next time, y'hear? Also it was time to take a break from the grey. UU classic may re-emerge at a later date, but I'm enjoying rocking the blue and yellow look right now. Also, I need I hiatus. Or a large ice cream sundae. Either is good. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 12:50, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

People who change their sigs are gay. Seriously. Sir Mordillo GUN WotM FP UotM AotM MI AnotM VFH +S 12:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

True dat. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 13:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for the Mills and Boon book cover! It looks real nice. Parsat, or, A Whole Bunch of Mischief 21:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My goodness no!

I never meant anything by it. Actually, when I make an article, I make it, save it to Word, hope microsoft doesn't crash, edit it a bit, then put it on the wiki. I adored you'r critisism of my article, and if I had wished to be bitter, I would've just just blanked you'r user page with "UR GAY!!!!" or something else. I wanted to make that article for a while now, and your review was one of the better formated (and less time consuming to use) that I've seen. I recignize I'm not the best writer*, and fully accept it. I just thought making a pardoy of how many people interperet the reviewers, who [at least that I've found] are the creme de la creme of the wiki, as well as the most sociable people I've ever met. I will admit, your format of the review did help decide exactly how to format the idiotic one. I like making fun of the ijits who say "OMG YOU FAGGOT Y DID YOU SAY THIS WAS DUM!!!!111". Such as this (a personal favorite example if Komrade Mayfair has no objections. I am so terribly sorry if I caused any offence and hope this can be resolved without my huffing. Which reminds me, would you mind doing a pee review on it, as a second opinion as its already been done. If it isn't good, please tear me apart.

Yours, in something User:Lord Serioch 00:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

P.S. May I ask a question about sigs? How do you make them?

[edit] Matthew Good

	BAD DOG!! Who did that? Did you do that? Did you PEE on my Matthew Good article!
	Now I have to go clean it up!

Thanks for your awesome review of my less-than-awesome article! Your suggestions and comments will be very helpful. I kind of figured that nobody wants to hear about this band, and it would be kind of hard to write, but I'm glad you think it has potential, so I'll keep adding to it. Muchly appreciated! -- Spillin DylanTALKEDITS03:49, Feb 7 2008

[edit] NINJA!

Thanks buddy! --THINKER 18:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tanks

[edit] Re. Bad AE

I'm not sure if you're watching my talk page or not, so I wanted to let you know I replied to your message on my talk page--Æ 14:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, if you have time, would you mind reviewing Fat Americans for me?--Æ 16:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

/me thinks AE is trying to set a record for the most times an article has been reviewed! That's how many times AE? MrN  20:33, Feb 10

[edit] Let's never mention this again, eh?

-- [SIR] e|m|c ^[talk] 20:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I gots something for youse

A big old review! Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Charles III (resub 1) Iffin you want. Sir DJ ~ Irreverent

Why thank you, it's just what I always wanted! You shouldn't ha... Oh, wait, you want me to review something? I mention on IRC how I should try to write more instead of review, so you give me a review? Are you trying to tell me something, huh? ;-) Anyways, I usually try to pick up the older stuff on the queue, as I know what it feels like to have articles stuck on there for ages. And I've promised AE I'll have the record-breaking 457th look at his Fat Americans saga, but sure, I'll get round to it later this week. I'll just go add it to my memory... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 13:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for the tips. I'll be sure to remember them. So long, and thanks for all the fish. Jimmy the Hellhound 14:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Could I possibly get you to review

this? It's on Pee. Thanks! Sir Mordillo GUN WotM FP UotM AotM MI AnotM VFH +S 11:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I'll add it to the list and get to it right after DJI's Charles III article up there. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 12:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Cool, thanks. Sir Mordillo GUN WotM FP UotM AotM MI AnotM VFH +S 12:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rough Pubs

Rabbi Techno is sending you this undoubtedly delicious beer to say thanks for voting for Rough Pubs! From Rabbi Techno

[edit] Travel Guide

Thank you very much for walking through the travel guide. Your edits are most welcome and if you feel that the article is worth further promotion I'd be happy and I'd feel honoured, of course :) NaturalBornKieler 15:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll be proud as hell when this one hits the title page. Thanks for your promotion. I'll buy you a beer when I get the chance in the course of my future travels ... NaturalBornKieler 21:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Image request

The image is great, just not quite what I needed. The tail (yes, I know I should have been way more specific, sorry) was meant to be more reptillian and exotic, and the man in the picture was meant to look more.....aristocratic - if that makes any sense. Like business suit. I want him to look presidential, just no famous presidents. Thank you a whole bunch for your pic, and it looks good. Just....not quite. Lord Serioch 19:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Follow up on Fat Americans

I did some work though I didn't finish quite yet. On Kaizer's review that you commented on, he said he disliked describing Americans as seperate species. The species thing obviously is sporked from American (species). Since it was given featured status, I'm guessing the voters didn't have a problem with it or it wouldn't be featured. That said, I don't think that would diminish its chances of being featured if and/or when I renom, but the voters might have changed. I'm not sure what to do, I personally like describing them as seperate species and I think it's funny, so I'd like your opinion on the matter. Thanks--Æ 02:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your input! I fixed it up a lot, do you think it's ready for VFH now, or do I have to do more work you think?--Æ 14:41, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Honestly AE, I think it's a little way off yet, and the reasons are much the same as the ones I gave on "Why?Wear clothes 3 sizes too small?" a while back. Basically, I think your prose style is quite direct - you get straight to your ideas, and don't but much around them. I think this contributes to the ranty feel, and it may help if you soften it up a bit, while still retaining the vitriol of your narrator. I personally feel that a bit more of a flowy prose style would help you here, and I'd like to give you an example here:

Hello everyone, and thanks for attending my totally non-biased seminar about Fat Americans - those "people who are known for eating a lot" that we hear so much about. We are here to cover both sides of the debate on Fat Americans, and to answer some commonly asked questions from previous seminars. In addition, we will attempt explain the solution to the problem. Er, to suggest possible solutions, if it is agreed to be a problem. Yes. Non-biased, that's me! Anyway, let's get straight on to discussing the extent of the issue.

Why are Fat Americans the target? Don't they exist in other countries?

I see many of you here scratching your heads in puzzlement, wondering why this seminar is called Fat Americans. One thing I'm constantly asked is: "why Americans, what do you have against them? Surely fat people exist in all countries?" To those people, I respond: You're wrong, fat people don't exist in other countries, only in America. When you see fat people in foreign countries, they're simply Fat Americans on holiday! Think about it - ever see a chunky Chinaman? A roly-poly Russian? Nope - those pesky Fat Americans get everywhere, and give us the impression that the problem isn't confined to their own corpulent country! Bastards!

Ahem. But of course, I'm non-biased. So I'll acknowledge that Fat Americans aren't the only obese people in the world. There are also Sumo Wrestlers. Although they may still be Fat Americans in disguise - you can't trust them.

What are Fat Americans?

Fat Americans are a subspecies of Americans. There are several differences between Fat Americans and normal Americans. One such difference is in their natural habitat, the fast food restaurant). While regular Americans will have meals at home, and on occasion even at normal, healthier restaurants, Fat Americans wouldn't dream of eating anywhere else. Indeed, they are unaware it is possible to eat anywhere else! They then consider the walk back to their SUV in the car park to be their daily exercise.

Another key difference is the fact that it is hugely difficult to distinguish the male of the species from the female. This is largely due to their genitals being obscured by layer upon layer of blubber, and also the fact that the males cultivate impressive man-boobs as part of their overall rotund physique.

However, they are considered a sub-species because in most other respects - intelligence, religious beliefs, fashion sense etc - they are remarkably similar to regular Americans.

There you go. Now, that's just quite quickly dashed off, and not brilliant, but do you see how it softens up the prose without compromising the feeling that this guy really has it in for Fat Americans? Have a think about working with the prose in this fashion a little more. I reckon it may well improve your VFH chances. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 13:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Wow, thanks. I did made a few modifications to that piece, but that was very good.--Æ 18:29, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Adware Article

Yes, I would love some help! I could email you a rough copy of what I wrote for the article and you could improve/rewrite sections of it if you'd like. The article was just a rough interpretation of a funny idea I had in my mind after I used my friend's adware riddled computer. I didn't exactly think the concept through as much as I should though. Thanks for realizing the potential in the article instead of making me feel like an unfunny n00b like Uncognito did.

[edit] Princess Leia RW

So tell me Under, if that is in fact your real name, When will I know if my article is good enough to replace the old one? (Cadarado425 13:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC))

Well, a pee review is generally regarded as a good start - get a good review, and you'll be fine! And real names are so boring, don't you find? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 13:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Well I really cant think how to change their names.... But I will consider it and if something comes up, I'll throw in a change. (Cadarado425 15:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC))

I meant my real name! ;-) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 16:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Good morning Under, I am finished with my RW on Leia, and have gotten a reveiw, although it was'nt the best that I hoped for, I think gas pump is a huge Star Wars fan and I think I hit a nerve. But I would like to have it moved, ofcourse it says I may not do it myself. Could you help me with this? P.S. what did you think of it. I don't take bad critizism well.(<CADARADO425> 09:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC))

Hi again. I'm kind of torn here - because you say you don't take bad criticism well, but at the same time, I saw the pee review and didn't exactly disagree with it. The problem here is that what you've put together is: a bit random; a bit vulgar for the sake of vulgarity, instead of for the sake of funny; listy and, well, not very consistent or funny. Sorry man, I want to say nice things because you've taken the advice I gave you and gone about things in the right way, and I really appreciate that. But this article isn't really any better than the one that's there. It's just different. Have you visited Illogicopedia yet? They are much more at home with random over there, and they don't have a Princes Leia article yet - you may find it fits a lot better over there! That's not to dismiss your chances at Uncyc, just to be honest with you.

Now, please don't let this put you off Uncyc - it takes a while to get settled around here unless you're incredibly talented. Look at my first article, for instance - it's passable at best! So take more time, have another look through HTBFANJS - I always find that helps, and read some more of the featured articles to give you more ideas of what will work. With practice, you'll find you get better at judging what will and won't fit in around here. Hope you take all this on board, and use it to move forward. Cheers now! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 10:00, Feb 23

YOU SUCK!!!!, No I kid, Thank you for your honesty, and suger coating the truth. I´ll look it over again, and see what I can do. Thanls for your time. --<CADARADO425> 14:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Yay, encouragement!

---

Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 20:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Uh oh....addiction? You know that the idle brain is the devil's playground, right? OH, we've got trouble.../me descends into incomprehensible babbling that vaguely resembles reminiscences of days gone by.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:31, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Indeed, and let this be a warning to you n00ber: poor Lj here hasn't had a featured article in, ooh, days now, and look at him. LOOK AT HIM! Don't look at him. LOOK AT HIM! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 21:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

*Looks away from Lj before his head explodes.* I'm up to no good again... (From Wikipedia's point of view...) ---- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 21:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Peer review

Thank you kindly for a constructive review of my first UnNews article. Since your review, I've attempted to give that penultimate paragraph the pay-off it deserves, as you suggested. I think it fits in with the article quite nicely, and adds to the humour, see what you think. --Knucmo2 15:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh yes, that's an improvement. Definitely. Like it! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 15:42, Feb 20

[edit] In regards toward a pee review and whatnot

Since you wanted to keep your reviewing fresh, I've decided to pawn off one of my recent articles onto your reviewing prowess. Please? Thanks.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:37, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Looks like Squiggle beat me to it. If you still want me to take a look as well, let me know. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 09:22, Feb 24

Only if you feel like you have any comments that he didn't get across properly. That is, write an appendix with anything else you feel you have to say. No need to waste your time with a full-on review.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:56, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I made some additions to the article, doncha know. I still don't require a new review from you (though, if you find yourself bored on the lunch break, feel free to stick it in there ifyouknowwhatimean), just some feedback. Like, "it's about as amusing as that God Case article you wrote" or "this sucks so much ass." I think you Brits like to use the term "pants". Odd.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem, I'll add it to my memory and probably have a look at lunch tomorrow. I can always use a laugh at lunch time. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 19:43, Feb 25

And it's all been done. Images and all. I even made a minimal effort. Gut?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Ja. Sehr gut. Also: Ist die katze tot? And now I've run out of German, I guess I'll wander over and nom it. I'm tempted to wait until The God Case gets featured, lest two Lj articles on the queue somehow distract people from my first nom in aaaaages. But I probably won't, because I just don't have the patience. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 10:15, Feb 26

[edit] I'm begging you

Can you please do a review of Gordon Ramsay? -- (talk) • (contribs) • (email me!) 22:42, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No need to beg, I'll happily review on request, provided I have the time! Done. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 11:48, Feb 24

[edit] What's that? A new flavor of ninjastar?

Oh and I guess you want one of these because you voted as well.

Lucky Lindy presents you with this Charles Lindbergh Signature Aerial Atlantic Aviator Watch (estimated value: $4 Civil War bucks) Thanks for voting for Charles Lindbergh over at that crazy VFH thing.

Thanks again. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 23:57 Feb 24)

[edit] Oh, another one!

You voted for me! *hugtackles* Yay! Now, where are the cookies?! -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 08:09, 26 Feb

I don't really do cookies. But if you continue to be helpful around here there may be... cake? Hugtackles are good - I may have to try delivering a few of my own some time. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 12:45, Feb 27

I can give you a bonus for some chocolate-walnut cake... :p -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 14:11, 27 Feb

[edit] Ahem..

May I take this opportunity to perhaps grace your userpage?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Actually, yes, but not with that one... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 12:43, Feb 27

[edit] From IViking

I am sorry. I didn't know how to reply to your comments about my reviews. I read it and I will look at the rules MORE CAREFULLY, as well as make detailed comments and helpful advice. Again, sorry for being a burden. --IViking 13:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I think you've merited one of these for a while now.

Favorite Person Award Congratulations, you're SysRq's new favorite person!

For being so active in both the Pee Review department as well as just dealings with new users and such. It just hit me that I haven't given you one of these yet. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:57 Feb 28

WHY IS DANE COOK ON THERE? WHY?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:42, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I dunno, he wasn't always there. I think he just wants more attention. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 01:52 Feb 29

[edit] Thanks, wot!

I seem to be a glutton of your talk page. Several times in as many days is quite a vague accomplishment. Anyway, this one is just a quick thank-you note for your vote for me on VFS. From just about the beginning of your stay here at Hotel Uncyclopedia (you can check out any time you like, but you can never leave), I could tell that you were exactly the kind of user who is great to have around. And lo and behold, you have grown to probably be more useful than I am (but don't tell anyone!). Thanks for the help in +sysop, and I promise not to ban you frivolously.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 04:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Nice to have you over. The problem is you pop over unannounced - if I knew you were coming, I'd arrange to be out make sure I have ice cream in. Everybody loves ice cream! In the meantime, have fun banning assholes! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 09:31, Mar 1

[edit] Thanks be to you!

Thankings from Led Thanks muchly for the vote for me on VFS. Now to abuse my powers... 03:38, 1 March 2008 TheLedBalloon (Talk | contribs) blocked <insert name here> (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite ‎(Muahahahaha!))

Thanks again for the vote, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:02, Mar 1

No problem Leddy. I'm just gutted the admins couldn't declare a 3-way tie and op Modus as well. All 3 of you deserved it! --Sir