User talk:Under user/Archive 7
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
[edit] I smell fresh meat.
09:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Man, a page can't maintain its innocence for longer than 3 minutes on this site. What's the world coming to? Actually, I think this is the first time you've graced my page Manticore. Welcome! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 09:40, Apr 11
- It's got colors. Colors of a gray, depressing sky! YAY! - CC Blah / Pee
- Well, I don't want to encourage any frivolity on my talk page. This is serious! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:53, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- How serious? - CC Blah / Pee
- (CHANGING TOPIC TO CORRESPOND WITH LEVEL OF SERIOUSNESS)
WHO DO YOU CONSIDER THE FOREMOST PHILOSOPHER OF OUR AGE? THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION.-- Hmm, toughie. One has to consider the intellectual claims of Chomsky, for example, and his considerable contributions to the sum of human knowledge. 4.252.99.182 also makes a strong claim for the title with his profoundly insightful comments on existence. But on reflection, I'd side with Lavigne, for her assertion that "Uh huh, life's like this, Uh huh, uh huh, that's the way it is". Elegant and profound - what more is there to say? -- Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
IF (1) LIFE IS LIKE A BOX OF CHOCOLATES, AND (2) EAT SHIT FUCKERS!!!, THEN AREN'T WE ALL JUST SHIT IN THE BIG SCHEME OF THINGS?- That makes no allowances for the other things contained in a box of chocolates, such as moulded plastic trays, ridged cardboard separators, little maps and warnings about possible nut content. Truly, you never know what you're gonna get... --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- That is indeed the shit we are to consume... Also don't take my chocolates! You'll get icky stains all over my articles >:( -- 13:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
I AGREE WITH DJ IRREVERENT. I WOULD CONCEDE THE POINT, IF NOT FOR THE FACT THAT I EAT MOLDED PLASTIC TRAYS ALONG WITH THE CHOCOLATES. I, UH, HAVE AN EATING PROBLEM.- Consider also that boxes of chocolate also contain air, which can't be "eaten" by conventional means, and also very occasionally dead flies missed by the hygiene processes, which can and are delicious. I see myself as the 0.0000087 % of the air that is Xenon. So not shit, in other words. You may have some self-images issues which you are trying to suppress with your packaging-eating. Have you considered seeing a doctor? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
EVERY TIME I SEE THAT DOCTOR, I GET BANNED, AND THEN I CAN'T SEE HIM ANYMORE. CONSIDER THIS STATEMENT AND WRITE A 500 WORD ESSAY TO THE EFFECT. USE THE MARGINS PROVIDED.
- That makes no allowances for the other things contained in a box of chocolates, such as moulded plastic trays, ridged cardboard separators, little maps and warnings about possible nut content. Truly, you never know what you're gonna get... --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- How serious? - CC Blah / Pee
- Well, I don't want to encourage any frivolity on my talk page. This is serious! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:53, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- It's got colors. Colors of a gray, depressing sky! YAY! - CC Blah / Pee
[edit] Serious Criticism And Bandwagons
I liked the old page bettah... but I like riding bandwagons even more! -- 13:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- In which case, where's your serious sig? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Reward!
| Javascap has decided that, somehow, you are a rightfully friendly fellow, and has decided to throw this colourful template onto your page.
|
For the great job you have been doing, and because I want to hand this fresh reward to SOMEONE. Cheers! Warm Regards, Javascap
[edit] yay! thanks for the delete vote!
--Moonzeppelin MUN 13:49, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, this is new... (Also, did I? I can't remember?) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 13:53, Apr 13
[edit] Blah
Vote, blah, vote, blah. DO YOU EVER DO ANYTHING WITH FEELING, MAN?!~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 21:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- How's about this from my contribs log: "09:28, 31 March 2008 (hist) (diff) m User:YesTimeToEdit/SigBook (it says everybody feel free to sign, and I'm one of everybody, so I Feel Free. Hmm, good song actually, time to listen to Cream again...)" That was only a couple of weeks ago, what do you want, blood? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 21:16, Apr 14
[edit] Tanks
|
Unfortunately Campaign Leaflet can not keep any of the promises it made campaigning as the $10 offered by the Pizza place down the street was just too good an offer not to fold for. But still, $5 Pizza - thats tonights dinner for YOU![1]
|
-- 07:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hey thanks.
I appreciate the second opinion. I hope I can take the fact you've gotten around to it to mean your Gran's feeling better. I've got a couple of follow up questions. 1. It's funny you mentioned VFD as I was a little concerned that it might come accross as too negative. I don't want to give the impression that we're a bunch of complete asshats. I'd like to also give the impression that there's fun to be found as well, but it's difficult to do in something like this. Got any suggestions? 2. I don't know if you're the right person to ask, but is there somewhere where all the helpful pages are collected? I'd like to link to them all in this article (in the spirit of helping noobs and all) but I'm sure there's several I don't even know exist. -OptyC Sucks!
cun 00:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hey
I got a few things to say to you. 1) Im surprised you have friends. 2) Your friend cant even spell rape right 3) You need quit meddling in friends buissness —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SasukeUchiha (talk • contribs)
- Really? Here are a few replies for you:
- I surprise people regularly.
- You can't even spell "I'm", or "business" right.
- You can't wikiformat either.
- I try to help out around here - generally, the stuff I revert is vandalism, and nothing more.
- If you have a problem with somethink I've done, let me know what it was - I do a lot around here. If I fucked something up, I apologise. Although judging by your manner, I'm not sure that's the case.
- SIGN YOUR POSTS. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 15:58, Apr 16
[edit] Hey you, I've got a bone to pick with you
What's up with you and reverting vandalism on my userpage? People work hard on that vandalism, you know! What kind of asshole are you?
And furthermore, you were editing my talk page! The insult! The horror! The dreadfulness!
And what's up with you editing the wiki?? Stop pressing "edit", you bastard!
GOD! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 17:20 Apr 16, 2008
- I know, and I didn't even have the courtesy to vandalise your userpage during Lent. I know you may never forgive me, but I'd like you to at least try! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 18:43, Apr 16
[edit] Tell me where you hid the body.
Hey, Punk!
You voted to get the UnScript featuring the most violent detective in the world to the front page to blow some heads clean off a few newbie shoulders. I'll keep this brief considering that I've been sitting on my ass for the last minute talking to you instead of carving holes into that punk Dexter.
So thanks for the vote.
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.
17/04/2008 @ 03:04- Really? Hey, that's cool - an extra thanks to you for an enjoyable read! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 09:27, Apr 17
[edit] No Shouting
No Shouting? <Apr 17, 2008 [13:28]>
- No. No shouting in the maintenance library. Naughty boys like Javascap who shout their name will get detention and miss recess. Or possibly a stern and disapproving UU glare. Either is bad. Also, do you prefer this lovely colo(u)r talk page to the gr(a/e)y? Crikey, this transatlantic spelling thing is tricky! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 13:33, Apr 17
- I remember when you glared at me that one time... yikes. Well, let me say first: CAJEK!. Let me say second: YOU WANNA REVIEW SOMETHING I WROTE? Let me say third: I like this better, because it reminds me of MY talk page (which has been quiet lately). THANK YOU, SINCERELY CAJEK. <Apr 17, 2008 [13:37]>
- ...I hope whoring was allowed... <Apr 17, 2008 [13:57]>
- That's not whoring, that's a review request - that's a different kettle of stuff you put in a kettle. I may well take a look at that later. I'm on another one of those days when I can do little bits here and there, but finding a block of time to concentrate on a review is a bit harder. I'll see what happens when I get home. Also, I'm not watching your faves page, but I did see you change it on RC - does that mean you're glaring at me? What the hell will happen if we get crossed glares? I'm feeling sparks build up as I type... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 14:00, Apr 17
- I have found that two people glaring at each other over the internet isn't like glaring in real life. Glaring is made of tougher stuff than this internets, although I can almost feel your glare from over here.
- That's not whoring, that's a review request - that's a different kettle of stuff you put in a kettle. I may well take a look at that later. I'm on another one of those days when I can do little bits here and there, but finding a block of time to concentrate on a review is a bit harder. I'll see what happens when I get home. Also, I'm not watching your faves page, but I did see you change it on RC - does that mean you're glaring at me? What the hell will happen if we get crossed glares? I'm feeling sparks build up as I type... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 14:00, Apr 17
- If you do review it, UU, thanks! I'm rewriting pages I find after going through special:random. Have you noticed that my last five VFH'd articles have been about animals? What does this mean? <Apr 17, 2008 [14:09]>
- Rightyho, I've got a good few minutes spare, here we... wait a minute, it's been done already, by The Improver. Well, there's a thing. Well, here's the deal: I'll give a second opinion if you want, but only if you want - so let me know. And yes, I've noticed you're able to say "my last 5 features". I have to talk about "my 5 features". *sob*. I'm sure I mentioned somewhere about you being too funny... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 19:42, Apr 17
- Second opinion would be appreciated, although I have to give improver credit: although he didn't get the article, he gave an extensive review and stuck with it. Thank you, UU! ...sorry about being funny. Here, have my brains. <Apr 18, 2008 [2:24]>
- Rightyho, I've got a good few minutes spare, here we... wait a minute, it's been done already, by The Improver. Well, there's a thing. Well, here's the deal: I'll give a second opinion if you want, but only if you want - so let me know. And yes, I've noticed you're able to say "my last 5 features". I have to talk about "my 5 features". *sob*. I'm sure I mentioned somewhere about you being too funny... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 19:42, Apr 17
- If you do review it, UU, thanks! I'm rewriting pages I find after going through special:random. Have you noticed that my last five VFH'd articles have been about animals? What does this mean? <Apr 17, 2008 [14:09]>
[edit] Picture request?
Hey UU, remember when I found that picture for your article? Could you do me a favor and touch up this image I made? Make it look like an actual post 9/11 mindset color coded alert system, if you can. You got time to do it, or should I come back later? it's for UnNews:Something Wicked This Way Comes. <Apr 18, 2008 [5:47]>
- I'll have a go - does the text reflect the colo(u)r you'd like in each bit, or is the black part of the joke, and you just want it touching up to look more professional? With this and the review, I hope to get to sorting it in a matter of a few short hours - after my dinner. Food must come first, as I am Lee Marvin. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 15:33, Apr 18
- The "blackness" of each section is part of the joke, and I trust you to find a way to include it. If you can think of a really funny/interesting 7th box to throw in there, that would be fine, too. Looking forward to your review! That was for the cute puppy, right? ...I just realized why you don't have more features: Your jokes are British! :D <Apr 18, 2008 [16:03]>
Wow, you've done so much for me UU: U rock. I'm going to update the list... <Apr 19, 2008 [13:17]>
- Oh, okay, you guys already did it! ...damn that was fast. Anyway, thank you again, UU! <Apr 19, 2008 [13:19]>
Is it possible to request another picture for Mordor Jalapeno? You did so good on that last one that I presumed... <Apr 23, 2008 [0:54]>
- Oh bugger, I've been so caught up in other stuff I totally didn't notice this request - if it still stands, let me know what you want and I'll give it my best shot tomorrow. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 20:41, Apr 23
[edit] I Nearly Killed Myself
Here, I want you to have this:
Oh shit! Dude, I'm so sorry. Was that your car? <Apr 24, 2008 [22:47]>
[edit] Pee Stuff
Hey UU, I happened to be on your talk page when I remembered noting that the Pee Review for User:VGDictator/secret/secret appears to have been moved to the "Reviewed" list, but it hasn't been reviewed. I originally said I'd take it on but quickly relised there was a lot of work to do and I didn't have time to do it there and then, so i jsut offered up what I would have put in the review for the "Prose and Formatting" section... Anyway that was a bit of a ramble, what I'm saying is that this game hasn't been reviewed but is in the reviewed list!! I really did make a meal of explaining that, oh well... - 03:39 26 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTE
- I apologise it was entirely my fault, Heerenveen has corrected it! - 03:46 26 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTE
hello, than you very much for your review, im not sure how to use chat on this site. Your comments were very helpful and i will look into making the changes you recommended. If you have any more comments, please let me know!!! ---gamestud —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gamestud (talk • contribs)
[edit] Dude you adopted
Thanks so much. :)
So I have one thing that's really nagging at me. I see pictures on articles like the one at the top of Biffy Clyro, and I would really like to know how to use/create/access those. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Darthmat (talk • contribs)
- Pics eh? Good: we start with something I know a little about! First off though, what are you referring to on the Biffy Clyro page? The Scottish template at the very top, or the pic of the personable young lady just below it? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 15:11, Apr 28
Scottish thingy at the top. I know how to use an image and put a caption like the girl. (I have one of those on my user page.) -(Darthmat) 15:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC) (Also, as you can see, my sig. reeks of phailure. Any tips?)
Did I phail? (Edit at the top of the page.) Ignorance Also, on the top of this page, the image keeps on changing. How do I do that? -(Darthmat) 15:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/User:Darthmat/signature - How did I do? -(Darthmat) 16:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
"ow you need to pop it in a page by itself, then go to your preferences page, and in the "nickname" box add User:Darthmat/sigpagename. Tick the "Raw signatures (without automatic link)" box, and you're done! Use the 4-tildes or signature button (Image:Button sig.png) to use your saved signature." I didn't do all that. I just copied and pasted the code, and this is what I got. (Exactly what I wanted.) -- Darthmat
(talk to me) 20:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Uh huh - but you'll find it quickly becomes really tiresome copying and pasting the code every time! Still, it's up to you man, it's just a suggestion... Nighty night, anyway! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 20:57, Apr 28
I just realized, the time stamp is really ugly. Advice?
- Oh 'eck - well, here's the code I use for mine: <small><font color="navy"><i>{{subst:CURRENTTIME}}, {{subst:CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{subst:CURRENTDAY}}</i></font></small> - play around with the substituted bits in that and you should be OK. If you do go down the preferences route for your sig (which I heartily recommend), then you simply add the code after the {{User:Darthmat/sigpagename}} bit, and it should work fine (although then you have to remember to sign with three tildes instead of the usual 4). G'night! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 21:02, Apr 28
Thanks! Will play around with it.-- Darthmat
(talk to me) 21:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
So now we have this issue. This issue is as follows. Darthmat asked me to adopt him. I agreed. Darthmat announce to you that you adopted him. You agreed. So, should I ban him, you, both of you, or simply ask you out for a dual? Or a date? Whatdaya think UU? ~ 20:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oh blimey - I didn't know about any of that. Er, how about you ban the date, and we forget the whole thing. I'd be tempted to recommend if there's any confusion that he go with his original request as you're a far better parent than me, and I haven't really got a clue what I'm doing! But if you're, y'know, busy being an admin and all, I'll do my best to help him instead. Seems a decent sort, and all that. And now if you excuse me, I've said g'night twice already on this page, and I am going to log out. In a minute. Honest! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 21:11, Apr 28
User talk:Darthmat/signature Finished. (And with some help from Jacques Pirat) - Darthmat
(talk to me) 21:49, Apr 28
[edit] Dude, you adopted?
I'm still under the thumb of my adopter. <Apr 28, 2008 [21:26]>
- I was never under the thumb of my adopter :P -- 12:05, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Your adopter was a free spirit: a spirit who was free and unhindered and yadda yadda! You can't expect him to be responsible! <Apr 29, 2008 [13:14]>
- <old fart> In my time we didn't even have adopters </old fart> ~
13:22, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Did you have audios for unnews? :D <Apr 29, 2008 [13:25]>
- <reckless fool>In my time we had adopters. Good ones. I just decided not to bother with one.</reckless fool> And look at how I turned out - a shining advertisement for why we need good adopters! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 13:27, Apr 29
- <old fart> In my time we didn't even have adopters </old fart> ~
- Your adopter was a free spirit: a spirit who was free and unhindered and yadda yadda! You can't expect him to be responsible! <Apr 29, 2008 [13:14]>
[edit] Pee?
If you have the time I would love you to review User:DJ Irreverent/Pre-Market Economy, right now it is in the finished writing down everything I can think of, needs cleaning up stage. I will go over it later to and give it more of a serious economic tone, cutting down and better intro. A lot of the humor is subtle and metaphorical and I am /trying/ to compare the market with children playing. Maybe I'm trying too much at once? -- 15:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, I would agree. That's a good way to put it. <Apr 28, 2008 [15:59]>
- I'll try to have a look later - I'm off home now! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 16:09, Apr 28
- Sorry DJ, not right now - I've been tinkering with Uncyc while doing other stuff tonight (real life important stuff, unfortunately), and I'm not going to have the time to give your article the attention it deserves until at least Wednesday now. I'll see what I can do then though - and I will add it to my memory to show I'm serious! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 20:47, Apr 28
Yeah thats good actually. I'm still fine tuning it to awesomeness so that is perfect for reviewing.Please understand that I have put tonnnnes of effort into this and kinda underestimated the difficulty of it with such an arcane topic. Oh congrats on UotM :) -- 12:01, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry DJ, not right now - I've been tinkering with Uncyc while doing other stuff tonight (real life important stuff, unfortunately), and I'm not going to have the time to give your article the attention it deserves until at least Wednesday now. I'll see what I can do then though - and I will add it to my memory to show I'm serious! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 20:47, Apr 28
- I'll try to have a look later - I'm off home now! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 16:09, Apr 28
It is ready save making the story sound more like a typical kids book at the end -- 14:36, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Rightyho, there you go, one review. I took a lot of time over that, as I wanted to make sure I respected the effort that's gone into its creation. I don't think you have much more to do, although the prose tweaks are needed, and you might want to consider the future of the big business section (I find it incredibly hard to cut anything from my own stuff, and that bit is quite funny, so I'll understand you leaving it in though). All told, a very good job indeed. As to your UotM comment above - there is still time left for that to change, although I'll concede it's unlikely. And while I'm obviously flattered by the votes and comments and the like, I'm slightly gutted not to be setting a brand new "4 noms without a win" UotM record, and also gutted not to see it going to Heerenveen, who I think really deserves it. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 20:19, Apr 30
Nom it if you like. I feel it is about 96% right, I just want to change the end of the story a bit but inspiration isn't coming even after reading it again. -- 16:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] thx
| FOOM
Thanks for voting for Why?:Burn a Furby? on VFH. Now get out there and incinerate some of those suckers! |

