User talk:Zombiebaron/archive20

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User talk:Zombiebaron.

No Shit!

How do you reckon the improver was NXWave? ~ 19:38, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, sannse did a CheckUser to confirm my suspicion, but many of his edits seemed highly fishy, along with the fact that his first edit was less than 10 days after Nekami's ban. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 19:40, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Good on ya Master Baron. ~

19:41, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

But... but Improver wasn't being a dick! CAKE J! <Apr 27, 2008 [21:51]>

I dare say he flew his real colors with the latest NotM drama. ~

21:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Yerr, I agree. It's easy to blend in when nothing controversial is going on, but when drama breaks out he just can't resist. Good job, Zombiebaron. Once again you've managed to solve all of our problems. =D ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex ! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEE ING • HP • BFF @ 23:27 Apr 27

Hi Zombiebaron (I don't think I've said hi before so hi :) ) yeah I'm pretty sure that User:HonestUser is a sockpuppet of The Improver or NXWave. He joined and only voted for The Improver (NXWave) in NotM and left. Then I quired on Mordillo's talkpage and suddenly a few minutes later he starts running round doing stuff. Maybe we should keep watch until we are sure but I have my suspicions. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent

07:49, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh, hello there Mr. Irreverent. While I do greatly appreciate your opinion on HonestUser (and I must say, it really does look suspicious), in the future I'd like to request that you voice such suspicions in a more private manner (PM me on IRC or email me), as, if it does turn out that HonestUser is, in fact, an honest user (Oh, the irony...), he/she would probably take very great offence at having other users accuse them of what is, de facto, one of the highest "crimes" an Uncyclopedian can commit. That being said, I do think that HonestUser's contributions are rather fishy, and I will have one of our faithful wikia staff members run an CheckUser as soon as I get a chance. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 21:31, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

See, I wasn't going to say anything, but I did notice that his edits are mighty suspicious. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex ! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEE ING • HP • BFF @ 21:39 Apr 28

Request for restoration of article

I haven't actually had an issue with an editor before, and I'm not sure that your talk page is the best place to hash such things out, however I noticed that you've deleted my article on "Nifty", which is about the website nifty.org, on the grounds that it appeared to be a vanity article. I wish you to reconsider this since 1) I'm in no way affiliated with nifty.org except as an occasional (okay, frequent) browser of that site and 2) the website contains 2.2 GB of stories, all carefully organized and catalogued, so it wasn't built by someone over the weekend who has had too many beers to drink. I know that I should have created the article on nifty.org instead of just "Nifty", so that it would be more obvious. The reason that Wikipedia doesn't have an article on nifty.org is the same reason that Wikipedia will never have an article on Encyclopedia Dramatica; it's just too controversial. However, it is mentioned in Wikipedia in its article on "erotic literature" with a one or two sentence description. I don't know if it counts for or against inclusion in Uncyclopedia but nifty.org has its own article on both Encyclopedia Dramatica and Urban Dictionary, so I think it's not obscure enough so that it doesn't merit inclusion in Uncyclopedia. Anyway, when you look beyond its pornographic nature the site is actually quite funny, and that in itself merits its inclusion in this website. --Serotonin deficient 07:20, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Nope. The only way that an article about such a subject would be "acceptable" would be if it appealed to the majority of Uncyclopedia readers. I couldn't, really, care less about what nifty.org is, does, or whatever. I don't care if ED and Urban Dictionary have entries. The best way to sum up the vanity policy at Uncyclopedia is the Codeine's Mum Rule: If Codeine's Mum hasn't heard of the subject of an article, it is vanity. However if Codeine's Mum could read said article, without knowledge of what it was about, and still find it funny, the article is alright. So, I suggest that you create your article at User:Serotonin deficient/Nifty, and make certain that even people like Codeine's Mum would find it funny, so that it can eventually be reinstated at Nifty. Oh, also, my talkpage is the perfect place for this. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 16:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

This surprised me

(Block log); 01:14 . . Zombiebaron (Talk | contribs) (blocked User:AllysonTheGreat with an expiry time of 7 days: Removing ICU tag)

You know that this user created this article, and was actually "blanking it". I guess because they did not want to meet the requirements of the ICU. Anyway, no biggie, I'm sure you are aware of the situation... Mr N 01:24, Apr 25

That's good. I always like it when I surprise people. They're all like "Hey, I didn't expect that Spanish Inquisition!", and I'm all like "Yeah, neither did I." Thanks for the feedback!!! -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 01:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi-could you restore my Ambrose Bierce page in my Namespace please?

I realize that i'm a little dryed up with this one, but I do intend to finish it (really). I would be grateful if you could do this:)--Sycamore (Talk) 08:47, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Done. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 12:04, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Zombiebaron:)--Sycamore (Talk) 13:35, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Ueinlttd Cemmnot

Excuse me sir, but I just made an article about my tiny private high school that no one has ever heard of and you deleted it saying it was vanity. How do articles about frivolous, ambiguous topics qualify as vanity? And there's no way that thing at the top that says "ignorable policy" is a just a joke. That thing is forreal, man. sir sysrq @ 21:28 Apr 16

Is this the part where I explain to you about how you're wrong and I'm right – as evidenced by the fact that I, obviously, have some knowledge of rules that you do not have, which made and makes me an admin – only to have you, foolishly and entirely true to form, ask me where the fuck I get off being so knowledgeable about the things that I know and that you do not? Because, if so, do, do, carry on. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 21:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Hold on a sec...are you saying that just because you've been here longer than me AND you're an admin, that somehow you know more about this site and how it works than I do? Well then in that case, I'm going to have to ask you to fuck yourself. Excuse me while I blank your userpage, which is obviously going to REALLY piss you off, seeing as how someone blanked my userpage recently and I still can't figure out how to get it back to the way it was. sir

sysrq @ 21:44 Apr 16

Great, now I have to butt in and tell you how much of a n00b you are, how sexy Zombiebaron is, and end up with some witty comment about waffles or Furbies to avoid getting in trouble. Then I won't comment under this section again, leaving everyone confused as to why I made a drive-by comment. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 21:47 Apr 16, 2008

While I say something like, "Oh, no. Don't stop there, lad. If you only blank my userpage, it may look like police brutality when I ban you forever. No, no. You must blank more. You must blank articles – the ones that have the little ninjastars in the corner are worth double the points. That, truly, is the only way you will both be able to prove that you (and your tiny school) matter, whilst taking revenge upon this whole cruel community of sarcastic sadists," then mutter about how that "drive-by comment" caused an edit conflict. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 21:54, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

That's it, now I'm actually going to do it. Expect a wave of user accounts from all my friends named Zombiebaron horny bitch tits fuck SkullHUMPER because he likes doing dogs in the FUCKHOLE to show up, moving your userpages around and such. Now I shall disappear, probably due to my being banned, and never act on these threats or post here again. Instead, I will find myself a new home where I will be loved and accepted. And they all lived happily ever after. Except me, I was stuck in the land of lulz screaming "UNCYC IS PHOR GAY FAGS!! THE MOAR YOU KNOW!!" sir

sysrq @ 21:58 Apr 16

And I, for my part, will have a BLT. Possibly a BBLT. That other "B" is for "bread". I find it sometimes adds a certain quality to my BLTs. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 22:02, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Untitled Comment

I'm sorry, why did you just huff the QHSSYC article? I just remembered this years seniors made the article about 2 years back or something, and checked up on it for the first time in maybe half a year, edited out some stupid asian gangsta note, next thing I see is the article gone (awfully weird timing) It doesn't really fall under vanity, and even if you can vaguely interpret it as that it's an ignorable policy. Our school has an article on wikipedia, so we made an uncyclopedia article, I don't see why it doesn't seem to be a valid article to you. Could you please think this through a little more? Thanks. If yo uneed a word from me my AIM screenname is shadic981...otherwise I don't know...I'll check back on your page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.193.251.144 (talk • contribs)

No. Seriously. The vanity policy is "ignorable" in that sense of the word "ignorable". I mean, you could ignore it. But if you do, your acticles will be deleted. And, that page was vanity. As for the timing, that's mostly thanks that edit today. We hardly have the time (or willfulness) to scoure through every page, but when things pop up on Recent Changes, they make easier pickings. Oh, once again, that article was vanity. No "if"s or "but"s. For serious. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 03:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

How? It's a small school with about 400 people (specialized highschool in new york city) but it gave us a good laugh reading it. It's provided a laugh for at least 100 people and it's on wikipedia as well. What's wrong with it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.193.251.144 (talk • contribs)

Well. Its a small school. That's the problem with it. I've never heard of it, and I'm sure well over 5 billion people have never heard of it. And none of those 5 billion people would have found the article funny. At all. Which makes the article vanity. Nobody cares about your tiny school. The article violated vanity policy. Wikipedia is not not Uncyclopedia. Case closed. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 21:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

why did u huff joppy furr, you are stupid

I have no idea what you are talking about. Also, I banned you. Just in case you havn't noticed yet. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 01:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

WTF, why did you huff Degobah Green? I wanted that as an article....

yo, do you know anything about this? USMC MOFO 16:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

And do you, kind dingbat, know the several headed eagle who lives under Neptune? -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 17:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Did you know that the "Upload multiple files"...

...doesn't seem to warn you when you're about to overwrite an existing file? I didn't. Now, I do. In the very least, I'll pay more attention next time. Or, less. One of those. Sir Modusoperandi 21:15, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Sounds like a plan. I know a guy who'll sell you the grappling hooks, if you'd like his adress. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 13:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I'll buy your children. I need the blood for the Passover. ~

13:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

That's strange. On this side of the Pacific, we normally just use goat's blood. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout)

...Atlantic? On this side of the Pacific, we use pot. Sir Modusoperandi 23:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

...for putting the PotM award on my page. Funny thing is, I had no idea was even nominated! Cool! • • • Necropaxx (T ) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP VotM PEEING~} 00:06, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Yessir. If you check the PotM vote archive (there's a link on the voting page...), you'll also see that I nominated you. So, your welcome. :) -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 00:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Untitled Message (Whoops, nevermind)

I don't feel like creating a new header for this because it's kind of unimportant. I notice that you huffed one Americanflag.JPG some months ago. It should probably be brought back if possible because it's used in the featured version of Me. Please find more constructive outlets for your fervent hatred of America. --Syndrome 03:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

You say that as though people look at featured versions of articles. It was unused (I assume) on any current articles, and was huffed. Simple as that. Plus, what's the point of constructively showing my hate for something, when I can show it destructively? Exactly. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM •