Uncyclopedia:VFH

1. Nom + For - Top notch stuff — Sir Sycamore (talk to me) 21:36, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
2. For. Judge Adriano "Legal" Zarbi Talk! Block me! 21:55, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

No against votes

• Uh I don't think I get it. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:37, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

1. Nom + For - Very good stuff — Sir Sycamore (talk to me) 21:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
2. For. Judge Adriano "Legal" Zarbi Talk! Block me! 21:56, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
3. Dig it -RAHB 22:03, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
4. Needs more pie. Me, not the article. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

No against votes

1. nom and for. lol. OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 17:41, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
2. Foar wow... ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Contributions  •  Masterpieces) __ 19:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
3. For. Cannot help it - this is serious front page material. Multilit  eralist 19:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
4. Penis! Judge Adriano "Legal" Zarbi Talk! Block me! 19:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
5. Ok, feels doneish to me now... Anyone that already read it, feel free to reread and make sure we didn't ruin it or something. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:44, Oct 10
6. SlapGIVE ME THE FUCKING MONEY! ~ 19:56, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
7. Stiff For- do the same or I'll cockslap you. DJ Gentoo, now with wit, sarcasm, and more Imperanon. Also in red. 20:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
8. For. lolcocks. Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 20:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
9. .33333333333333.... self for -RAHB 20:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
10. For.   CAKE J! <20:30 Oct 10, 2008>

• Against. - Not feeling it — Sir Sycamore (talk to me) 19:22, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

1. Comment: Well, I'm not sure if it's quite done yet... Wait 'til RAHB or Dr. S comes back around, then... something...? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:23, Oct 10

1. nom and for. so VFH is slowing down again. the solution? everyone write more, and everyone nominate awesome articles. i've just done the second. now i'm off to tackle the first. do it. you won't. OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 16:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
2. For, although it should be pointed out that they both suck compared to anyone involved in biostatistics. Those guys can calculate how hard to party to the eleventh decimal place! Sir Modusoperandi 19:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
3. 4 - Damn micropipetting bastards... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:28, Oct 10
4. Self-for. This article is entirely factual, by the way. pillow talk 20:11, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
5. For.   CAKE J! <20:31 Oct 10, 2008>
6. For. Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 20:40, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
7. For. Oh, hell yes. I almost forgot about this until it resurfaced here. Strong for from me. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

No against votes

• Abstain - The style is not my thing, though I like the idea. — Sir Sycamore (talk to me) 19:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

1. I came to this article from the pathetic Karate page and found myself laughing. So here goes. • • • SIR FELLOW STAIN Necropaxx KUN {PotM VFH VFP VotM PEEING} (Beseech) 16:01, Oct 9
2. For. A competent piece all over. Multilit  eralist 09:14, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

No against votes

1. Self For & Nom -- Geoff Prickett  (Speech) 21:36, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
2. For Although I'm not a fan of the style of writing, kinda confusing at times, this made me laugh. A lot. It could do with some more/better pictures, though. --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 20:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
3. For. I would advocate some polishing, but it's an OK piece. ----OEJ 15:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
4. for with a lower case "L". It could use a good buff up. Dame GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

1. Against. Uncyclopedia is not a place to write lemons. Things that don't work in this article: The concept. Incest isn't funny, it's just incest. Neither is telling little children about incest. If you wanted me creeped out, fine, maybe. But it's not funny. More stuff that doesn't work in this article: Sex. Sex isn't funny, it's just sex. You've just written an entire article about a sexual encounter. If this was fanfiction.net, awesome. This is Uncyclopedia. Other things that don't work: My granddad's penis. True story. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) Quote of the Day 00:59 Oct 09, 2008
2. Nasty. Geoff, although Uncyc is known for its appreciation of sex humor, there is a line, and I think you crossed it. Just a little. • • • SIR FELLOW STAIN Necropaxx KUN {PotM VFH VFP VotM PEEING} (Beseech) 16:11, Oct 9
3. against as per necro. OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 19:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

• Pee Review? ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Contributions  •  Masterpieces) __ 22:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
• Skull When they get to that age, they don't know if they are coming or going... MrN  01:01, Oct 9
• Pee Review? Please Check Here! Geoff Prickett  (Speech) 05:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
• Sick stuff and sex are funny subjects. I just watched some League of Gentlemen episodes in which: 1) a coroner described autopsies, denied the existence of God, and implied that he had sex with corpses ("plugged their orifices"); and 2) a female preacher informed a grade-school class that God was going to wreak His most horrible vengeance on them, causing a little boy to collapse in despair across his desk. The argument that incest or offending children is too taboo to be the subject of an Uncyc article is nonsense. Woody Allen satirized sheep-fucking in a movie back in 1972, and it remains classic comedy. Sex is funny as hell! But yes, explicit descriptions of the acts are usually not very effective. In literature, sex is much better implied than described. So I agree that the article could be more satirically sophisticated. The author might also remember the Lolita Lesson: Nabakov turned Humbert's virginal nymphet into a sullen and unpleasant young woman, and thus punctured the fallacy of very young girls as sexual objects. Satire gets interesting when it punctures fallacies. The over-sexualization of society is a very legitimate target for satire, and that might be one place this article could go deeper. ----OEJ 15:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

1. Self for & Nom Geoffprickett 12:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
2. for. i liked this, despite having no idea what the hell a 'wurzel' is. too many rogue punchlines, though. OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 19:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
3. For. I found it humORous to the max, even though I have no idea who these peole are.   CAKE J! <21:05 Oct 08, 2008>
4. Weak for • • • SIR FELLOW STAIN Necropaxx KUN {PotM VFH VFP VotM PEEING} (Beseech) 16:05, Oct 9
5. For MrN  20:39, Oct 10
6. Weak For. Not bad. I'll give it support though. Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 20:40, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

1. Against. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 17:16, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
2. Against. I'm a fan of wurzels and i love the idea of them havin an article. I just don't think this is particularly well done. i do like the idea that ur parodying other "family" type bands where they all have the same stage surname, maybe u can have danny wurzel as a parody of danny filth from cradle of filth, and have a ramone guy aswell. Also, was this even peed? --ScottBurnan 19:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
3. What the fuck? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) Quote of the Day 00:54 Oct 09, 2008

No, Scott, it was not peed, but had been on offer for over a week. Geoffprickett 20:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

1. selfnomfor. i surprised myself by how much i liked this after i finally wrote it. what say you? OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 13:09, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
2. For. I'm actually playing this game right now Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally CUN GotA 13:20, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
3. For. Dark Ermac 15:14, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
4. For I havent played that exact game but I know enough about the world to get it. Funny stuff. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 15:47 8 October 2008
5. For. I Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 17:18, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
6. For. Did pass the chuckle test, thank you. • • • SIR FELLOW STAIN Necropaxx KUN {PotM VFH VFP VotM PEEING} (Beseech) 15:10, Oct 10

1. Against Did not pass the chuckle test, I'm afraid. Sorry. Geoffprickett 16:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
2. Against. Utterly love the game, and am a fan of the author, so it pains me to say that it didn't really tickle me. It's well written and stuff, but just didn't get me giggling. Kind of felt obvious all the way through. Sorry dude. --UU Blah / Pee 15:23, Oct 10
3. Against. Per UU. Enjoyed it, but the funny just wasn't there. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 18:53, Oct 10

• Comment. I need utter silence to announce that... *sob* I have NEVER played a Zelda game!! And therefore, don't really know what's going on here.   CAKE J! <13:26 Oct 07, 2008>

this makes you an outcast among nerds. good thing you're funny, or else we'd feed you to the rancor. (oh god i hope you've seen star wars). OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 14:03, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Neither have I, you are not alone Cajek, however I do know what a rancor is, and have an extensive star wars action figure collection from when I was a kid. ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Contributions  •  Masterpieces) __ 01:32, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

It's a good thing YOU'RE funny, Gerry, or I'd... uh... what was that Zelda game where you blew the flute and the talking boat thing went to places? Anyway, yeah, I'd ride you like a boat.   CAKE J! <3:36 Oct 08, 2008>

It wasn't a flute! It was a Wind Waker! You ignoramous! Though to be fair I've only played Wind Waker and Twilight princess. Also I'll read the article momentarily. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 15:40 8 October 2008

'blew the flute'? what kind of video game do you think this is? OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 16:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

~o~

Divine beauty

Sophia is not featured?

What heresy!

~o~

1. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
2. For Hell yes! I was thinking about doing this earlier... -- Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 00:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
3. For. I will be goddamned! / This should have been a feature / long before today. ----OEJ 01:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
4. For. 220.233.64.132 03:11, 6 October 2008
5. For. haikus are easy / but sometimes they don't make sense / refridgerator. Dark Ermac 15:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
6. for. OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 13:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
7. For. Haikus are very very very good / God damn, this is hard! / Refridgerator.   CAKE J! <13:44 Oct 07, 2008>
8. For. ~ 11:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
9. For. I don't know nothing 21:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
10. For. Amazing! Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 00:55, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
11. 4 - Haikus have the pow'r / to make anything funny / even poor people. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:42, Oct 9
12. For - Feature it ONE day / Its not forever is it? / others can win to! Dame GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
13. For. Judge Adriano "Legal" Zarbi Talk! Block me! 22:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

1. Sad against. I hate to be joyless / but this page is not so great / She deserves better. Sir Modusoperandi 03:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
2. Hang on a sec... Are you saying that this article should be featured based on, not its merits, but its title? In that case, why don't you nominate my user page first, then we shall discuss on this article again, in great details? -- JoeMonco 12:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

   Just to be clear about this, that's not what I'm saying. The name makes it an important article, but the name itself doesn't increase the quality of the article. I just think the article itself, though it could be somewhat improved, is good enough to be featured. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:11, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

3. Against. Haikus and stuff are fine / but this page is no fave of mine / it's patchy you see / hence an against from me / oh shit, have I got this wrong again? (Per Modus). --UU Blah / Pee 13:37, Oct 8
4. It's a page of haikus. Most of which make more of an attempt to be a haiku than an attempt to be funny. If I wanted to read a bunch of things attempting to be haikus, I have a whole book of haiku poetry. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) Quote of the Day 01:02 Oct 09, 2008
5. Against. I like haikus, but / there are better articles / that should be featured. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:45, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
6. Against. - Per the others — Sir Sycamore (talk to me) 11:48, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
7. What JoeMonco said. ^ • • • SIR FELLOW STAIN Necropaxx KUN {PotM VFH VFP VotM PEEING} (Beseech)