Wikipedia Discussion Page

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wikipedia Discussion Page article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Contents 1 Topic of Article? 2 Completely Unsourced 3 Peer Review 4 Remoevd 5 Not Notable 6 On line 5 Should we be using a comma or a semi-colon? 7 WTF? 8 Umm.. 9 Very important discussion subject!!!

[edit] Topic of Article?

So, wait, I'm confused, what's this article about?-MKCL12 11:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

I think it's supposed to be an article completely in the form of a wikipedia talk page-Halab3rton 11:12, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

But what is it a talk page for?-MKCL12 11:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

I killed your mother.

It's NOT a talk page FOR anything, I think it's more like a general parody of all wikipedia talk pages.-Halab3rton 11:31, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

No, I get that. I'm just curious what supposed wikipedia article this parody talk page is supposed to be a parody talk page of.-MKCL12 11:49, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Oh... I have no idea.-Halab3rton 12:10, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Completely Unsourced

If an Article is going to make this many claims, and expect to be taken seriously, It should have at least some kind of source to back it up. -ExactlyMinty 21:18, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

I added in links to these two sights here: [1] and here: [2] . -1929Gone21:30, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

They have nothing to do with the article. I'm taking them out. Someone find some real sources. -ExactlyMinty 21:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

You can't just determine that. Get a consensis first! I'm putting them back in -1929Gone 21:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

I don't need a consensis if they're totally irrevelent! I'm taking them back out. -ExactlyMinty 21:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

No Way. It took me like 10 minutes to find those links. They're staying. -1929Gone 21:54, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

That's like the 9th time I've taken them out. Put them in again, and I'm getting a Mod. -ExactlyMinty 22:03, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

You can go ahead and get one! I'm putting them right back in. Just go on and email one. Then We'll see who's right. -1929Gone 22:06, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

This is what you emailed me for? It's new years eve and you've both spent the last hour on here. Get off this website and Seek professional help. -SirModly 22:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Peer Review

Just so you all know, I'm putting this article into peer review. You should expect a lot more activity on this talk page over the next few weeks.-UltimateShowDON24 14:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Remoevd

Teh section with that pitcure of that old guy was dumb. I took it out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 19.819.959.102 (talk • contribs) 13:32, 4 June 2007

Could you please post a link to the portion of the article you're referring to? I'd find it myself, but you appear to have made many edits to the article and I don't have enough time to go searching through them all.-Xabitses 13:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

ARe You even litsining? I took it out! It's gone from the article. Don't be such a N00b! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 19.819.959.102 (talk • contribs) 13:51, 4 June 2007

I mean link to the older version, from before you edited it...The one that would be available under the History button. -Xabitses 13:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

UR mOMs a history button! BURN! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 19.819.959.102 (talk • contribs) 14:01, 4 June 2007

...Yeah...My Mom is an electronic button on my computer screen that recalls previous versions of an article, and can be found to the right of the edit button on a Wiki. You really got me there...

Anyway, I was somehow able to find the section you were referring to, and I've put it back in. Actually I just reverted all your edits. Next time you want to take out an entire third of an article, I'd consider consulting the talk page first, then editing -Xabitses 14:15, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Well... I got the last WOrd Now. ANd if U take the time to respond to this UR LAMe and if you don't respond UR a looser. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 19.819.959.102 (talk • contribs) 14:19, 4 June 2007

I'm Banning you. Not just from editing, but from the entire internet. -SirModly 15:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Not Notable

I just came across this article and I've never heard of whatever it's about. I'm nominating it for Deletion. -Ever8Taffy 8:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

You can't just do that. The Article's got over 300 edits!-UltimateShowDON24 9:57, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

So? I've never heard of it, and Nobody I knows heard of it. Not Notable. -Ever8Taffy 10:20, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

It's people like you that concern me for the safety of the internet. -Xabitses 14:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Damn that was fast. If anyone is curious, the vote was keep. -Xabitses 14:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] On line 5 Should we be using a comma or a semi-colon?

Enough. I've deleted this entire debate for annoying the hell out of me. Yes, I can do that kind of thing. -SirModly 22:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WTF?

Who started this Article? -H2oWNED 21:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

I did, Why? -Sgore 21:39, 4 September 2007

Because it sucks. -H2oWNED 21:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey! Okay...yeah, it kind of does.-Sgore 21:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Umm..

This page looks a lot like Talk and talk page. -- Some Guy 03:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, but this one's about Wikipedia, not just random nonsensical ramblings. -- Spillin Dylan 02:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Very important discussion subject!!!

Dude, this isn't funny. --Midasminus 16:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)